Maciel Escapes Harshest Actions; But Sanctions Signal This Pope’s Resolve

By Gerald Renner

 

May 20, 2006

 

The Vatican’s sanctions against the Rev. Marcial Maciel Degollado serve notice that under the papacy of Pope Benedict XVI, such high-ranking insiders will no longer get a pass when serious allegations of sexually abusing children are raised against them.

The charismatic founder of the conservative religious order, the Legionaries of Christ, Maciel avoided for nearly 30 years answering complaints that he abused young boys in seminaries.

Pope John Paul II never responded to formal complaints against Maciel made through official church channels in 1978 and 1989, and a canon law case against him was quashed without explanation in 1999.

But now, in the wake of his experience handling sex abuse cases as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Benedict is bent on removing what he called “filth” in the church in a widely publicized sermon last year.

In the most high-profile case on his watch so far, Benedict has moved against Maciel, who had been repeatedly praised by John Paul over the years and had highly placed friends all over the Vatican.

As a result of Benedict’s action, Maciel, 86 and ailing in his hometown of Cotija, Mexico, finds himself stripped of his public persona as a priest, no longer able to preach, say Mass in public or speak to the media.

It is a most ignominious end for a man who has been a priest for 62 years and a respected church leader for half a century.

The restrictions placed on him after a year’s investigation are most gentle compared to what the penalty could have been – defrocking (or “laicization” as the church calls it), suspension or even excommunication had a canonical trial been held.

Instead, the Vatican expressed compassion. It placed a statement on its website Friday (www.vatican.va) saying that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith “decided – bearing in mind Fr. Maciel’s advanced age and his delicate health – to forgo a canonical hearing and to invite the father to a reserved life of penitence and prayer, relinquishing any form of public ministry.”

The statement indicated that the decision was made by the new head of the congregation, American Cardinal William J. Levada, and approved by Benedict.

“It’s a polite way of saying he has been suspended for life,” said the Rev. Thomas P. Doyle, a Dominican priest and canon lawyer who has been a strong advocate for sexual abuse victims. The sanctions against Maciel would not have been imposed had the congregation not found some of the charges against him well-founded, Doyle said.

The Vatican “showed an extraordinary degree of compassion for the accused, but I have seen other cases where older priests have not been laicized because of their age,” Doyle said.

The Vatican did not publicly specify what the accusations against Maciel were, but referred to the canon law case brought against him in 1998, which entailed sexual abuse charges brought by nine former Legionaries. The charges were first made public in The Courant in 1997. The accusers claimed Maciel abused them during the 1950s and 1960s when they were young boys or teenagers, ages 10 to 16, in seminaries in Spain and Italy.

In canon law, sexual abuse charges have an effective statute of limitations of 10 years, but that can be waived by the pope. However, in the eyes of the church, the most serious charge against Maciel has no limitation – that he absolved in confession some of the boys he is accused of abusing. Such a charge under canon law amounts to a sacrilege of the sacrament of reconciliation, which incurs automatic excommunication.

During the yearlong investigation by Monsignor Charles J. Scicluna, a “permanent promoter of justice” for the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, other people surfaced who had not come forward before and said they had been abused by Maciel. Scicluna interviewed more than 30 people in the investigation, which concluded at the end of 2005.

In a statement released from the Legionaries’ U.S. headquarters in Orange, Conn., Maciel continued to proclaim his innocence.

“Facing the accusations made against him, he declared his innocence and, following the example of Jesus Christ, decided not to defend himself in any way,” the statement said.

“He has accepted this communique with faith, complete serenity and tranquility of conscience, knowing that it is a new cross that God, the Father of Mercy, has allowed him to suffer and that will obtain many graces for the Legion of Christ and the Regnum Christi Movement,” the most lay auxiliary of the Legion.

Glenn Favreau, a former Legionary who worked with Maciel in his Rome headquarters and is now a leading critic of the Legion, said he expects the Vatican to quietly focus attention on reforming the religious order. He said many of the people Scicluna spoke to in his investigation were people who knew nothing of sexual abuse.

They testified about what Favreau said was the intensely secretive and psychologically abusive way that Maciel set up the Legion to operate. Favreau, a recent graduate of the University of Michigan Law School, said for instance the Legionaries must take private vows not to criticize actions of superiors and to report on those who did. He said the confidentiality of spiritual counseling is often violated.

Maciel founded the Legionaries of Christ in 1941. The order says it now has 650 priests and 2,500 seminarians in 20 countries. One of those seminaries is in Cheshire.

Although the Vatican statement said it “gratefully recognized” the work of the Legionaries and of Regnum Christi, Favreau said that was just cover.

“It will be handled silently,” he said. “No one said everything was hunky-dory.”

Gerald Renner is a retired Courant religion writer.

 

Legion Leader Faces Sanctions; Report: Vatican To Restrict Ministry Of Maciel, Accused Of Sex Abuse

By Gerald Renner

 

May 19, 2006

 

Pope Benedict XVI has restricted the ministry of the Rev. Marcial Maciel Degollado, founder of the Rome-based Legionaries of Christ, who has been accused for years of having sexually abused young seminarians in his charge, according to a report published Thursday.

The Vatican would not confirm the report but said it would issue a statement about its investigation into the charismatic, 86-year-old priest as early as today.

The restrictions were reported online by the National Catholic Reporter, an independent weekly newspaper, following a week of rumors of some kind of action against Maciel.

John Allen, Vatican correspondent for the newspaper, reported that Vatican sources said the restrictions placed on Maciel amount to a finding that at least some of the accusations against him are well founded.

According to the story, which cited Vatican sources, Maciel is restricted from publicly acting as a priest. He is not defrocked – “laicized,” in church terms – but he cannot celebrate public Masses, give lectures or other public presentations, or give interviews for print or broadcast. The pope approved the restrictions shortly before Easter, the story said.

The first public allegations against Maciel surfaced in a Courant report in February 1997. Nine former members of the Legionaries said Maciel abused them in the 1950s and ’60s when they were young boys or teenagers, ages 10 to 16, in seminaries in Spain and Italy.

The Vatican did not respond directly to the allegations. Later that year Pope John Paul II appointed Maciel as his personal representative to a high-level meeting on the Americas, signaling his full support for the priest.

Maciel, a native of Mexico, founded the Legionaries of Christ religious order in 1941. The order says it now has 650 priests, and 2,500 seminarians in 20 countries. Its U.S. headquarters is in Orange, Conn., and it has a seminary in nearby Cheshire.

Maciel was repeatedly praised by John Paul and other high church leaders. Maciel and the Legionaries vociferously proclaimed his innocence. Maciel accused the nine men of a conspiracy to defame him.

David Clohessy, national director of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, said Thursday that “Maciel is the most powerful Catholic official to ever face Vatican sanctions for child sexual abuse.”

“It would have been easy to let this case quietly go unresolved, as so many similar cases have,” Clohessy said. “We deeply appreciate that, at the highest levels of the church, action has been taken against such an extraordinarily high-ranking Catholic leader.”

The Rev. James Martin, associate editor of the Jesuit magazine America, said the Legionaries had enormous support in the Vatican because of their loyalty to the church, their conservative views and their success in recruiting candidates for the priesthood.

“So to take action against their founder is absolutely stunning,” Martin said. “Benedict shows his independence by taking on a darling movement of the conservative right.”

Spokesmen for the Legionaries in Rome and in Orange said that they had no comment because they knew nothing of any Vatican action against Maciel.

Juan Vaca, a former priest who headed the Legionaries’ U.S. operations in Connecticut from 1971 to 1976, and who said he was abused by Maciel beginning when he was a 12-year-old boy, was cautious Thursday.

“My reaction is I am still in my state of expectation until I see the official document and the official statement from the Vatican. We have been waiting for so long,” said Vaca, who lives in Holbrook, N.Y., and teaches psychology at Mercy College in Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.

Vaca left the Legionaries in 1976 to join the Diocese of Rockville Centre in New York. He and another priest, the Rev. Felix Alarcon, sent letters to the pope accusing Maciel through official church channels in 1978 and 1989 but never got a response. Vaca left the priesthood. Alarcon, who established the Legionaries’ U.S. headquarters in Connecticut in 1965, is a retired priest in good standing in Madrid.

Vaca and Alarcon were among eight former Legionaries priests and seminarians who filed a canon lawsuit against Maciel in 1998 with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which was assigned by Pope John Paul to handle sex-abuse charges against priests. The case lay dormant and no action was taken.

In January 2005, several months before he was elected to succeed John Paul, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger authorized the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which he headed, to investigate the charges. Within days Maciel announced he was retiring because of his age and moved to his hometown of Cotija, Mexico.

A yearlong investigation was concluded at the end of 2005. It was conducted by a Maltese priest, Monsignor Charles J. Scicluna, a “permanent promoter of justice” for the congregation.

Scicluna traveled to the United States and Mexico, where he interviewed more than 30 people, several of whom claimed abuse but had not publicly come forward. Others were summoned to Rome.

Those Scicluna interviewed included former Legionaries priests and people associated with Regnum Christi, an auxiliary of mostly lay people who support the Legionaries. Two who spoke on condition of not being identified said in interviews with a reporter last fall that they knew nothing of sexual abuse but had complaints about what one called “psychological abuse.”

News reports of Scicluna’s investigation triggered confusion after the Legionaries of Christ in Rome sent out a press release last May saying that “the Holy See” informed the order that “there is no canonical process under way into our founder … nor will one be initiated.”

The Legionaries’ statement was confirmed to the press by the Rev. Ciro Benedettini, vice director of the Vatican Press Office. “There is no investigation now, and it is not foreseeable that there will be another investigation in the future,” Benedettini said.

He made no reference to Scicluna’s investigation or how that squared with his statement that there was no investigation.

It turned out that the denial of an investigation originated in the office of Cardinal Angelo Sodano, the Vatican secretary of state and a staunch supporter of Maciel. His office had nothing to do with investigating allegations of sexual abuse. Only the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith could speak to it, and its members are bound by an oath of secrecy.

Gerald Renner is a retired Courant religion writer. An Associated Press report is included in this story.

 

Vatican restricts ministry of Legionaries priest founder; Move seen as confirmation of sex abuse allegations against Maciel

Media Reports growing by the minute

 

Related Articles:
Catholic News Ageny
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=6764

Boston Globe:
http://www.boston.com/news/
local/connecticut/articles/2006/05/18/
vatican_to_comment_on_sex_abuse_case_against_legionaries_founder/

Ireland OnLine:
http://breakingnews.iol.ie/news/
story.asp?j=183141342&p=y83y4zx48

Much more to come

 

Posted Thursday May 18, 2006 at 9:12 a.m. CDT

Vatican restricts ministry of Legionaries priest founder
Move seen as confirmation of sex abuse allegations against Maciel

By John L. Allen Jr.
Rome

Capping a decade-long on-again, off-again investigation of accusations of sexual abuse, the Vatican has asked Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado, the founder of the Legionaries of Christ, to observe a series of restrictions on his ministry.

In effect, Vatican sources told NCR this week, the action amounts to a finding that at least some of the accusations against the charismatic 86-year-old Mexican priest are well-founded.

Maciel has not been laicized, but the restrictions issued shortly before Easter by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith limit Maciel’s public activity, such as his capacity to celebrate public Masses, to give lectures or other public presentations, and to give interviews for print or broadcast.

The restrictions have been approved by Pope Benedict XVI, and the Vatican is expected to issue a brief statement shortly.

Vatican sources stressed that the action against Maciel should not be read as an indictment of the Legionaries of Christ or its lay branch, Regnum Christi.

A spokesman for the Legionaries, asked to comment on the development, replied in an e-mail, “We have nothing to say. We don’t know anything about this.”

According to sources who spoke to NCR, the congregation’s investigation was closed sometime toward the end of 2005. In the early months of 2006, the cardinal members of the congregation in Rome were invited to review the documentation. The decision to impose restrictions was then reached sometime before Easter.

Sources described the documentation collected by the congregation as involving the testimony of at least 20 accusers. The acts in question, according to these sources, reached into the 1980s.

One cardinal who serves on the congregation told NCR that, in his view, the material left little doubt as to the validity of the charges, though he said he was less clear how Maciel understood what he had done. Under canon law, intent and state of mind are sometimes taken into consideration in meting out punishment.

Within the Vatican, the Maciel case has long been seen as particularly sensitive, in part because it could tarnish the reputation of the late John Paul II, who warmly praised and repeatedly honored Maciel. The case could also call into question the action of Benedict XVI, who as prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith stopped the case against Maciel in 1999. However, he reactivated the case in 2004 and ultimately approved the disciplining of Maciel.

A senior Vatican official told NCR that the decisive break came only in late 2004, when a number of additional accusers came forward. Prior to that, he said, both John Paul and then-Cardinal Ratzinger, now Benedict XVI, were operating on the assumption that the charges were not justified.

Maciel becomes perhaps the highest-profile priest in the Catholic church to be disciplined for allegations of sexual abuse.

He has a distinguished Catholic lineage. Two of Maciel’s great-uncles were Mexican bishops during the anti-clerical persecutions of the early 20th century. One, Bishop Rafael Guízar Valencia of Veracruz, was beatified by John Paul II in 1995, and a decree recognizing a miracle that clears his path to sainthood was signed by Benedict XVI April 28. Maciel’s uncle, Jesús Degollado Guízar, was the last commander-in-chief of the Cristeros army that took up arms in defense of the church.

Founded by Maciel in 1941, the Legionaries of Christ has become one of the most influential and rapidly growing communities in the church. Today the order numbers some 650 priests and 2,500 seminarians worldwide. The lay branch of the Legionaries, Regnum Christi, reportedly has 50,000 members worldwide.

The case against Maciel has followed a circuitous path.

Rumors of various sorts have long dogged the Legionaries’ founder. In 1956, he was deprived of his faculties to govern the Legionaries and sent into exile in Madrid while a canonical investigation was carried out. Charges at the time did not include sexual abuse but other matters such as excessive control over seminarians, theft and drug abuse. In 1959, the investigation cleared Maciel, and he was restored to his functions as superior general.

Read More
Read nine years of NCR coverage of Fr. Marcial Maciel and the Legionaries of Christ: Archive of NCR stories about Fr. Marcial Maciel.

Maciel later referred to this period of trial as “the Great Blessing.”

Complaints of sexual abuse first surfaced in the late 1990s, when nine former members of the Legionaries filed a canonical complaint against Maciel with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, alleging that they had been abused by Maciel as seminarians and young priests. Those acts, according to the accusers, dated to a period from 1943 to the early 1960s.

The Legionaries, and Maciel personally, strenuously denied the charges.

“Before God and with total clarity of conscience I can categorically state that the accusations brought against me are false,” Maciel wrote in April 2002.

One of the original accusers later recanted; another died.

The accusations became public through 1997 articles in The Hartford (Conn.) Courant by Jason Berry and Gerald Renner and in the National Catholic Reporter, based on the Courant story. The two reporters filed another major piece on the case for NCR in December 2001, noting that canon lawyers in Mexico and the Vatican had found the accusations to be credible but that then-Cardinal Ratzinger had halted the investigation of the charges in 1999.

According to Renner’s and Berry’s earlier reporting, the nine who originally brought accusations claimed that Maciel “first abused them when they were between the ages of 10 and 16, sometimes telling them he had permission from Pope Pius XII to engage in sexual acts with them in order to gain relief from pain related to an unspecified stomach ailment.”

After the case was reopened in 2004, the congregation’s promoter of justice, Maltese Msgr. Charles Scicluna, began to collect additional testimony. Sources told NCR that the eventual number of accusers who came forward against Maciel was “more than 20, but less than 100.”

On Jan. 20, 2005, Maciel declined reelection as the superior of the Legionaries of Christ and was succeeded by Fr. �lvaro Corchera Martinez del Rio. Around the time of the death of Pope John Paul II in 2005, Scicluna traveled to Mexico to collect testimony from additional accusers. Later, Scicluna prepared a final dossier, which went before the cardinal members of the congregation and eventually Pope Benedict XVI.

Even for those convinced of Maciel’s guilt, the outcome of the case was long in doubt because of his strong track record of papal support.

Maciel accompanied John Paul II on visits to Mexico in 1979, 1990 and 1993. During the 1993 trip, it was John Paul’s public tribute to Maciel as an “efficacious guide to youth” that prompted the original nine accusers to come forward.

As late as 2002, when John Paul visited Mexico City, Maciel was in the front row at a papal Mass at the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe, and was greeted by the pope. In a 2004 letter, John Paul II congratulated Maciel for 60 years of “intense, generous and fruitful priestly ministry.” The pope said he wanted to join in the “canticle of praise and thanksgiving” for the great things he had accomplished.

In a book-length 2003 interview with journalist Jesús Colina of the Zenit news agency published as Christ is My Life, Maciel described dining with John Paul in the Apostolic Palace on several occasions. John Paul also appointed Maciel as a delegate to three synods of bishops, as well as to the 1992 meeting of the Latin American bishops in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. In 1994, John Paul made Maciel a consultor to the Congregation for Clergy.

Vatican observers suggest that at the time John Paul II regarded the charges against Maciel as malicious, ascribing them largely to hostility to Maciel’s doctrinal conservatism and his tenacious defense of the papacy.

The original accusers, however, earlier told NCR that they tried for many years to reach John Paul II with information about Maciel. Two of them said they sent letters in 1978 and again 1989, both by diplomatic pouch, but received no reply.

Other Vatican officials have also spoken positively of Maciel.

“Dear Father, I’ve seen the great work that you do,” Cardinal Angelo Sodano, the Vatican’s Secretary of State, said to Maciel while embracing him during a November 2003 visit to Regina Apostolorum.

On May 20, 2005, the Secretariat of State under Sodano released a statement indicating there was no canonical case against Maciel, nor was one foreseen. It is the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, however, that has responsibility for sex abuse cases, and the congregation continued its inquest.

Now-Cardinal Franc Rodé, a Slovenian and the Vatican’s top official for religious orders, celebrated a Mass marking the conclusion of the Legionaries’ General Chapter at the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe in January 2005, and used the occasion to praise Maciel.

Rodé called Maciel “the instrument chosen by God to carry out one of the great spiritual designs in the church of the 20th century.”

Speaking on background, Vatican officials explained these comments in much the same way as they did John Paul’s praise for Maciel. At the time, they argued, the evidence against Maciel was not yet complete, and looking at what these officials regarded as the positive works of the Legionaries and Regnum Christi, they assumed “by their fruits you shall know them.”

The Legionaries maintain a Web site defending Maciel, which can be found here: http://www.legionaryfacts.org/FATHERMACIEL.html.

[John L. Allen Jr. is NCR Rome correspondent. His e-mail address is jallen@natcath.org.]

May 18, 2006, National Catholic Reporter

More links:
http://www.forbes.com/work/feeds/ap/2006/05/18/ap2757286.html

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/mershon/060518

http://breakingnews.iol.ie/news/story.asp?j=183141342&p=y83y4zx48

http://www.cathnews.com/news/605/116.php

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/14611994.htm

http://www.beliefnet.com/story/191/story_19166_1.html

 

VATICAN SPURNS MACIEL, No special invitation extended to Legion founder for great-uncle’s canonization

Spanish language notice

http://www.milenio.com/index.php/2006/10/04/4659/

MILLENIO.COM

A tiempo | Tendencias

 

The Vatican confirms that Maciel will not be invited to the canonization of Guízar

Sources from the Pontifical Congregation for the Cause of Saints have indicated that the Holy See did not extend special invitations to the ceremony to be headed by Benedict XVI in St. Peter’s Square.

Vatican City — The Vatican has denied that there is any reason to invite the former director of the Legionaries of Christ, Fr. Marcial Maciel, to participate in the canonization of his great-uncle, Rafael Guízar y Valencia.

Sources from the Pontifical Congregation for the Cause of Saints have confirmed to Notimex that the Holy See did not extend special invitations to the ceremony to be headed by Pope Benedict XVI in St. Peter’s Square.

Mexican media outlets have speculated on the possibility that Fr. Maciel might attend the canonization ceremony at the Vatican this October 15, interpreting it as his public comeback to the ecclesiastical world.

On that date the pope will celebrate the religious rite declaring Rafael Guízar y Valencia (1878-1938) a saint — the first bishop from the Americas to be designated as such [ReGAIN editor: not sure what this phrase means]. At the same time three others will receive the same honor.

They are Filippo Smaldone (1848-1923), priest and founder of the Congregation of the Salesian Sisters of the Sacred Hearts, and Rosa Venerini (1656-1728), founder of the Congregation of Pie Maestre Venerine.

A French woman, Theodore Guérin (1798-1856) — virgin, and founder of the Congregation of the Sisters of Providence of St.-Mary-of-the-Woods in Indiana, USA, where she spent a good part of her life — is also to be canonized.

Guízar y Valencia was great uncle to Marcial Maciel, who on May 19, 2006 was restricted in his ministry by the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith as a disciplinary measure for “crimes reserved for the exclusive jurisdiction of that office.”

On that date an official notice from the Press Office of the Holy See announced the invitation “to the father to a reserved life of prayer and penitence, renouncing all public ministry.”

There are two schools of thought among canonists associated with the Catholic Church’s central government on the possible presence of the founder of the Legionaries of Christ at the canonization in St. Peter’s Square.

Since he was not suspended “a divinis,” which would otherwise preclude this possibility, some claim he may attend without violating the disciplinary sanction, provided “he does so always and only in a personal capacity, and only as one of the faithful, without actively taking part in the ceremony.”

On the other hand, sources close to the Vatican courts revealed to Notimex that Maciel’s presence would be a violation of the disciplinary sanction, which was imposed and is still fully in force.

***

[Original Spanish language version]

Fuentes de la Pontificia Congregación para la Causa de los Santos confirmaron que la Santa Sede no extendió invitaciones especiales a la ceremonia encabezada por Benedicto XVI en la Plaza de San Pedro.

Ciudad del Vaticano.- El Vaticano rechazó que exista razón alguna para invitar al ex director de los Legionarios de Cristo, el sacerdote Marcial Maciel Degollado, a participar en la canonización de su tío abuelo Rafael Guízar y Valencia.

Fuentes de la Pontificia Congregación para la Causa de los Santos confirmaron a Notimex que la Santa Sede no extendió invitaciones especiales a la ceremonia encabezada por Benedicto XVI en la Plaza de San Pedro.

Medios de comunicación mexicanos han especulado con la posibilidad de que el padre Maciel asista a la ceremonia de canonización el próximo 15 de octubre en el Vaticano, interpretándolo como su reaparición pública en el ambiente eclesiástico.

Ese día el Papa celebrará el rito mediante el cual se declarará nuevo santo al primer obispo de todo el Continente Americano, Rafael Guízar y Valencia (1878-1938), junto a otros tres beatos que llegarán al honor de los altares.

Se trata de Filippo Smaldone (1848-1923), presbítero y fundador de la Congregación de las Hermanas Salesianas de los Sagrados Corazones, y Rosa Venerini (1656-1728), fundadora de la Congregación de las Maestras Pías Venerinas.

También la francesa Theodore Guérin (1798-1856), virgen y fundadora de la Congregación de las Hermanas de la Providencia de Santa María de los Bosques en Indiana, Estados Unidos, donde pasó gran parte de su vida.

Guízar y Valencia fue tío abuelo de Marcial Maciel, quien el 19 de mayo pasado fue restringido en su ministerio por la Congregación para la Doctrina de la Fe del Vaticano como medida disciplinar por “delitos reservados a la exclusiva competencia de ese dicasterio�.

Una nota oficial de la Sala de Prensa de la Santa Sede de esa fecha estableció la invitación “al padre a una vida reservada de oración y penitencia, renunciado a cualquier ministerio público�.

Sobre la posible presencia del fundador de los Legionarios de Cristo en la Plaza de San Pedro para la canonización existen dos versiones de parte de canonistas vinculados al máximo gobierno de la Iglesia Católica.

Por un lado se afirma que puede asistir sin violar la medida disciplinar “siempre y cuando lo haga a título personal, sólo como fiel sin formar parte activa en la ceremonia� ya que no se trata de una suspensión “ad divinis�, la cual impediría incluso esta alternativa.

En segundo término, fuentes cercanas a los tribunales vaticanos confiaron a Notimex que de presentarse Maciel estaría violando una sanción disciplinaria inflingida y con plena vigencia.

 

My Participation in Ongoing Marcial Maciel Sex Abuse Investigation

Christmas 2005: to Men and Women of Good Will and Open Mind
By John Paul Lennon, MA
Friday, April 2, 2005
From approximately 2:45 to 4:15 pm
John Paul Lennon,ex-Legionary of Christ [1961-1984] was interviewed by Mons. Charles J. Scicluna at a Church on Park Avenue in New York City. The Vatican ‘promoter of justice’ was accompanied by an Australian priest who acted as official notary.
DEPOSITION

I gave my personal biographical details which involved my Legion curriculum.

An oath was administered I would tell the truth in my deposition.

The content of the deposition involved my experience of and contacts with Fr Marcial Maciel: first meetings with MM, his interaction with the community; what was my relationship and dealings with MM; how he liked attention, special treatment. Had MM any special relationships with first Irish seminarians? I told him I had never been sexually abused in the Legion by MM or by anyone else.

“Can you give a character portrait of MM? I told about my ‘run-ins’ with MM
Do you feel there is credence to the accusations that MM has sexually abused LCs?
Do you know Juan J. Vaca? Do you trust his story?
Do you know Jose Barba Martin?
Do you know Arturo Jurado?”

The interview, which was sworn, notarized and signed, lasted about 90 minutes.
At one point Mons received a call on his cell phone. When he tried to pick it up he lost it. Later we realized that the call was from the Vatican telling him of the Pope’s death. After the interview we became aware that Pope John Paul II had died; together Monsignor, the notary and I said an Our Father for the repose of his soul

Why was I involved? It seems to me that I was called to be a ‘character witness’ for the three accusers, and to give personal testimony regarding the person and character of MM. I was reminded of the way the Church conducts an annulment, whereby at least one of the parties has to request it [the petitioner?] and then this person must present two witnesses to vouch for the validity of their request. So it was like being a witness for three of the accusers.

PSALTER OF MY DAY IN NEW YORK

In the shadow of one of our country’s greatest natural disasters, the author remembers
GRIEVING FOR ALL Legionaries and Regnum Christi members
THE DAY THE POPE DIED

New York, April Fools Day, 2005

Walking from Penn Station to 3rd and 40th Street

City of smells,
Dogs sniffing each other on corners,
Labrador and Yorkshire;
Taxis chopping your toes,
Citizens fast off the mark at traffic signals,
And tough-looking cops;
Talkative strangers immediately intimate,
Crowded grungy elevators,
Stub-stained carpets,
Newspaper stands,
Flowers, fresh vegetables and fruit,
Tobacconists, boutiques, lobbies and
Little parks among skyscrapers.

I have come to Gotham to make a deposition before a Vatican representative.

INTERVIEW WITH MONSIGNOR CHARLES SCICLUNA,

Promoter of Justice, Congregation for the Faith, at the Church of Our Savior, 59 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Saturday, April 2nd, 2005
From 2:45 until 4:18pm

Deposition was interrupted at 3:37pm by a phone call to Monsignor; someone was trying to get through to him from Rome headquarters to notify him personally that His Holiness John Paul II had died.
LAMENT FOR THE ABUSED

At 9:30pm that night in my hotel room a great wave of pain swept over me,
A tsunami of sorrow for my Legionary brothers and for myself.
I cried unabashedly for them,
For the sexually abused by Father Maciel,
For all those abused in and by the Legion of Christ and the Regnum Christi Movement in any way, shape or form.
Maybe because I was not allowed to be a brother to them when I was in,
The flood-gates of compassion opened and
Great groans of grief
Broke from my spirit,
From my very soul.

I wept for the men I had vouched for:
“Do you vouch for the integrity and truthfulness of
Juan Jose Vaca? -Yes, I do
Jose de Jesus Barba? -Yes, I do
Arturo Jurado? -Yes, I do�

I had just said good-bye to Juan Jose, his dear wife and his precious daughter;

Suddenly breaking down unexpectedly:

“Dear ex-Legionaries and ex-members of Regnum Christi,
We have been abused in multiple ways.
Let us treat each other with Love and Empathy.
In the name of Christ,
Let us not accuse or
Recriminate each other, or be
Judgmental, or Self-Righteous.
We, the survivors,
Some of whom have not yet been able to grieve properly,
Let us be supportive and gentle towards each other.

I grieve for the LCs and RCs,
Especially for those who do not grieve;
For those in denial,
For those in avoidance,
For those stuck in Reaction Formation –‘Who, me abused?
It was all so wonderful!’-
I grieve for you,
I, the disgruntled old man;
I, who have been able to take care of my mental and emotional health;
I, who have listened as the abused told their stories;
I, who have believed and understood;
I, who have accepted their testimonies…,

I, too, was a victim to some extent,
But I am no longer helpless, or hopeless;
Nor am I bitter.
I am a survivor;
Recovering from multiple wounds
To body, mind and soul.

I feel anger and wrath against
The perpetrator of this abuse.
I feel indignation because my confreres’
Innocence was betrayed and their
Human dignity was trampled on.

We the survivors,
Have been tempted to strike back
Against the Church that has permitted this,
Covered it up, or took no action.
But delving into the spirituality of Jesus
Has led to restraint:
‘…I am calm and quiet
Like a weaned child clinging to its
Mother.’ [Psalm 131, v.2].

We come like the Poor of Yahweh
To the temple of truth of our conscience
To plead for justice;
And our real Father who sees in secret
Will hear our plea [see Matthew 6, 6]

We, the ‘disgruntled old men’,
Will insist like that old widow
Until Justice is done:
‘Then will not God give
Justice to his chosen,
To whom he listens patiently,
While they cry out to him day and night?
I tell you he will give them justice soon enough.’
[Luke 18, 1-7]�.

Translate »
%%footer%%