Review of ‘Christ is My Life’: A Swiss Cheese Riddled with Holes

A Swiss Cheese Riddled with Holes

by José Barba Martín, PhD

Book Review and Commentary on Christ is My Life, Interview with Marcial Maciel by Jesus Colina

“The psychoanalyst’s question facing a psychotic text is: ‘what should I do with it?’ which means, as far as psychoanalytical discourse is concerned, ‘what should I say about it?’ (…) Lacan states that the psychoanalyst should serve as a secretary to the alienated. But this does not mean that he should simply be ready to take notes. To be a secretary to the alienated is also to do what Freud did: introduce the subject.”

(Eric Laurent, La psychose dans le texte)

“The essence of evil is its unredeemed ambiguity (…) Evil pretends to be a contemporary, an equal and a twin brother of Goodness.”

(Emmanuel Levinas, Humanisme de l’autre homme)

 

ENCYCLOPEDIC FATHER MACIEL IN THE LIMELIGHT

To a true believer and a spiritually well-read Catholic the title of this book evokes Saint Paul’s words- “Vivo ego, iam non ego, vivit vero in me Christus” (“I live, but it is not I who lives. It is Christ who lives in me”). It also calls to mind the title of the saintly Irish abbot of Maredsous, Dom Columba Marmion’s prestigious spiritual conferences- Le Christ, Vie de l’ ame. One might immediately conclude the interviewee has certainly been in good religious company.

And yet, to those who have heard things up close the enchanting music has a different sound. It must have been in 1953 that a young victim, frustrated by Senator McCarthy’s shameless public interrogation tactics, asked the evil persecutor during one of the last hearings- “Haven’t you any decency left, senator?” This came to mind as I finished reading the complete Christ is my Life in the original Spanish.

For the book, far from an ‘interview’, is a collection of recipes gathered from other “official” Legion of Christ sources. The date of the publication (April 2003) demonstrates how it is another of Marcial Maciel’s ‘impersonations’, intended to counteract former Legionary of Christ Alejandro Espinosa’s devastating memoir, El Legionario. At the same time, it creates a gnawing sense of perplexity, distressing unease, and increasing mistrust in the informed reader and many other Catholics, lay and clerical, who read it.

The book is also used to highlight Marcial Maciel’s “wisdom” on every possible issue: “the Christ-centered life”, Protestant sects, Marxism, Theology of Liberation, the cultural revolution, Globalization, September 11, the Jews, the “collective imagination”, bio-ethics, “Faith and Reason”, Marcial Maciel’s ‘own’ writings, Descartes, Kant, Edith Stein, Don Quixote, time and eternity, “psychology as a human science”, “the world of the Internet” (of which -revealingly enough- says he: “we should not be afraid”(!). Even Samuel Huntington cannot feel snubbed: his The Clash of Civilizations was included too. And a trenchant proof that Marcial Maciel is quite up to date (and of the fact that this book was prepared as a riposte to last February’s exposé of Maciel by Alejandro Espinosa) is that the recent Iraq war build up is also mentioned. So Marcial Maciel’s “answers” cover, definitively, “De omni re scibili“, every possible issue, past, present, and future. It is also noteworthy that, making the most of the occasion, the book intends to methodically sing the praises of Marcial Maciel and the Legion of Christ. At the same time, one by one and step by step, the book exposes all the “misunderstandings”, “accusations” and “calumnies” raised for decades, and especially in recent years, against them.

For the book has taken good care to cover each and every one of the Founder’s and the Legion of Christ’s “weak spots”. It justifies the Legion’s curriculum of studies for the priesthood, its sect-like praxis, the conveyor-belt, robot-like formation of its members, the peculiar understanding of Evangelical poverty, the “secret vows to protect charity and humility”, the lack of respect for individual freedom and personal spiritual discernment, the premature vocational decision, the manipulation of spiritual direction, the “gospel a la carte”, the businessy use of “efficiency”, the long forgotten attention to the poor, and, the most ineffable topic here, “temptations”, “authenticity” (or lack of), and the Erick Fromm-like “being and having”.

CONTENT ANALYSIS

The word “calumnies” appears on nine different pages, opportunely correlated with the concept of “pardon”. The word “chastity” appears only on two pages, and -most amazingly- the word “conscience” shows up on no less than fourteen pages! “Culture”, surprisingly, is repeated on ten pages. “Contemplation” and other concepts of inner life show up on fourteen pages. His Holiness Pope John Paul II, -this is a must! – gets a good ration: he is mentioned on no less than forty-five pages. On the other hand, for the Legion of Christ, “a socially minded institution”, the word “workers” is mentioned much less: three times. “Women” are mentioned condescendingly on four pages. And, since everything had to be covered according to a pre-rehearsed program, already drafted in the sixth part (“A Vision of the Church”), the “journalist” at one point must suddenly exclaim: “But we have not talked about the bishops!”

Analyzing the content of the book, its structure, its disposition, the encompassing purpose of its one hundred and fifty-two carefully numbered apologetic “answers” and the timely inclusion of important names of highly influential co-involved contemporary Vatican personalities is revealing. It becomes perfectly evident that the target readers are churchmen of high and medium rank, people knowledgeable in religious affairs, “traditional enemies of the Legion of Christ”, the common legionaries of posterity, and very specifically the Mexican bishops. How come? The Mexican bishops, through their spokesperson, Monsignor Abelardo Alvarado, have been pressing Marcial Maciel lately to respond formally to the increasing accumulated oral and written testimonies against him. Marcial Maciel’s first typical response was his argument “by dignified silence”, his usual stalling tactic. This is then followed by the choreographed visit of Maciel’s personal and official representative, Fr. Octavio Acevedo, LC, to the bishops’ spokesperson. On the coattails of the useless emissary follows this book of “interviews”, meant to answer all questions, without having to be specific, and avoiding the thorny ones.

The “interview” book (Madrid, Fundación Logos Ed., April 2003, 289 pages), is divided into eight parts preceded by a prologue supposedly written by Jesús Colina, the “interviewer”, who incidentally –caveat emptor- is (was) a member of the Legion’s lay branch, Regnum Christi,  and the founder and director of the Legion’s Zenit Information Agency.

The first three parts of the book’s eight are biographical dealing with Marcial Maciel’s childhood, his vocation, and the foundation of the Legion of Christ. The fourth part treats the Legion of Christ: its “charisma”, mission, and its members. The fifth part presents the Regnum Christi Movement. The sixth offers “A Vision of the Church”. The seventh returns to “personal experiences”, and the eighth offers a perspective on the world today and tomorrow.

Far from being a spontaneous encounter between the “journalist” and the founder and director general of the Legion of Christ, each part of the “interview” is divided into a series of obviously highly structured questions and desk-crafted reflective ‘answers’; both, quite evidently, written by the same person. Marcial Maciel has been for an exceptionally long time a pioneer in what the Spanish writer Vicente Verdú, in his recent book El estilo del mundo, calls “fiction capitalism”: an atmosphere where everything is subject to copy and imitation, where deceit and undeclared substitution play a vital role. But, since undoubtedly their kingdom is indeed of this world, why should Marcial Maciel and the Legion of Christ be more honest than Enron or Xerox, Christie’s, and Sotheby’s. And, regarding publishing, why not try the strategy of New York Times reporter Jayson Blair who stole information from other journalists, invented statements and simulated notes dated in places where he had never been?

THE GREAT IMPERSONATOR

The book attributed to Marcial Maciel and the “journalist” as an “interview” seems to those of us familiar with the Great Deceiver and his tactics like one more of the impersonations he pulls off with extraordinary ease. We must admit: Marcial Maciel deserves the Pulitzer Prize for impersonation, mimicry, and disguise, for he is as versatile in spiritual-looking matters as certain rock singers imitating better vocalists and musicians, with rhythms a la mode, surrounding chorus catch-phrases, sensationalist limelight and all. He is the perfect actor, without ever having opened Stanislavski. To those of us who remember Saint Paul’s words: “Induimini Jesum Christum…” (‘Let us put on Jesus Christ’) they sound terribly ironical in this context. Marcial Maciel, perfect actor as he is, has paraphrased them as a title for his book, Christ is my Life, and unmistakably aimed them at those who do not know him well enough.

But Marcial Maciel overlooks the fact that -as Vittorio Gassman once remarked to fellow-director Luciano Lucignani in a real interview- “theater is a dangerous profession (…) in the sense that it has to do with a kind of mental illness. It is a profession with components of pathological dimensions (!). The actor, like the witchdoctor of primitive societies, is an individual with special powers, true or simulated (…) who has become the guide and the path on a risky journey, a voyage towards something that does not exist (…). The actor, or whoever makes this journey, runs the risk of fracturing his individual personality, exposing himself to schizophrenia (…). For, in fact, what is an actor? He is someone who by profession, by choice, by nature, function or whatever, lies continuously (…). The actor lies always, he is always ready to become, to become somebody, who wants and accepts to “be” somebody else (!) Camouflage, garments and disguise are the tools of the actor’s profession.”

If Vittorio Gassman’s intention had been to go deeper into the analysis of certain men’s psyche, he might have considered the serious point of coincidence between a medieval jurist and a contemporary essayist. For “according to C. Braun, quoted by Enrico Pozzi in Le paradigme du traitre: “De façon générale les traitres sont tous ceux qui expriment ouvertement quelque chose par leur actions tandis que ills agencent autre chose en cachette dans leur esprit.

In the light of our past experiences the great performer, Marcial Maciel, who usually only sings “solos”, now, in this “interview” performs his longest duet ever, throwing in lots of falsettos; in more than one sense.

STRUCTURES OF DECEIT

Once again, we are facing another case of authorship by proxy. We know that on a previous occasion Fr. Gonzalo Miranda, LC, was the de facto author of The Complete Formation of the Priest (La Formación Integral del Sacerdote, Madrid, Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos, 1990). This volume was included in the convenient, though totally undeserved, company of Saint Augustine, Saint Therese of Avila, Saint John of the Cross, Saint Thomas Aquinas, Marcelino Menéndez y Pelayo, Werner Heisenberg! All this happening just a year before the 50th anniversary of the Legion of Christ. After half a century it was embarrassing for Marcial Maciel and the Legion of Christ to appear bereft of doctrine, and it was urgent to show the world that Marcial Maciel did have some ideas after all. Besides, permission to start the Regina Apostolorum Athenaeum in Rome had to be obtained, and it was particularly important to influence bishops in Latin America to send their best priest candidates to be taught by Legion of Christ instructors.

We think the “interview book”, the way it is fabricated, can only be possible because everything, specifically people, are mere instruments to Marcial Maciel. This is basic. “I like to move my men like checkers”, Marcial Maciel is reported saying. Once in Cóbreces, Santander, Spain, in the Summer of 1952, he asked one of us to bring him a table game. A game of chess was brought to him. He immediately said- “No, I want checkers!” And we saw how much he enjoyed gobbling up his opponent’s pieces, tongue in cheek, in a fast mode. And that is an example of how Marcial Maciel, who says he believes in long-term preparation, at the same time expects, attempts, gets and enjoys fast, expedient results. Which corresponds to a man who, as we sadly know, has been subject to hidden, personal, licit and illicit caprices for most of his life.

Concerning the spirit and intention of Marcial Maciel’s 289 pages “interview”, we think one could most accurately apply certain lines from one of Jorge Luis Borges’ Fictional short stories: “… a long novel written in the first person, in which the narrator omits or deforms the facts and falls into contradictions which allow a few readers -but only a few- to occasionally decry an atrocious, sometimes totally false reality…”

In no part of the book are we told that Jesús Colina is an ex-member of the Legion of Christ and now a Regnum Christi member. Or that the Zenit News Agency and the Logos Foundation are directly or indirectly financed, manned, and run by Legion of Christ or Regnum Christi members; even tho’ they are. The whole work is imbedded in ambivalence. Even visually: its front cover shows the ambiguous face of the androgynous Christ of Salvador Dalí’s “Last Supper”, raising a finger of his right hand in a way that very narrowly falls short of an obscene gesture. Marcial Maciel most probably did not know that Dalí­ chose his wife’s (Gala’s) face to portray Christ’s. He most surely did not know either that Dalí titled one his paintings “The Great Masturbator”. Again it is the Legion of Christ’s cult of the façade, which eventually betrayed Marcial Maciel so many times. But his goal was, as always, to promptly charm the non-thinking viewer; a spectator whom the Legion of Christ describes later, with a Robert Heilbronner title, as the true believer. This is the ‘true believer’ in manifold multiplied large quantities: for, how many of today’s readers check the facts in this hasty world of ours?

Yes, as the ancient Latin writers would say, the book “redolet oleo”- “it smells of oil”, meaning here that it is not the true record of natural, personal, direct conversations, but rather the product of nocturnal desk homework. Thus, not his own “oil” but somebody else’s, under obedience, and with the help of Legion of Christ history files, Marcial Maciel’s letters, etc. Probably imposed on someone like Fr. Javier García, LC, who, most probably wrote it, thoroughly lectured as to its “necessity”. For Marcial Maciel could be described with Andrew Carnegie’s epitaph: “(Here lies) a man who knew how to group together men more capable than himself.” A man who, like Carnegie, knew that “the secret of success lies in the art of making other people do your work.”

The style of the book contradicts the claim of really reporting true spontaneous answers to free, open questions. And, yes, the content shows that “Marcial Maciel’s” letters, memoirs and other LC treasures are obviously and constantly being used and intermingled with quotations from pontifical documents. “How right Pope John Paul II was in writing the “Fides et Ratio” Encyclical Letter!”, and well-chosen long scriptural passages readily and impeccably quoted “by heart” in such an admirable way that, as is commonly known, was never ever one of Marcial Maciel’s fortes. Besides, earnestly speaking, did MM ever once read the complete New Testament?

We repeat: it seems quite clear that most probably Fr. Javier García, LC, and a small, secret ad-hoc team of LC members were the ones who were instructed to concoct the new numbered catechism on Marcial Maciel’s life, views and “doctrines”. Fr. Javier Garcia LC, a professor of Christology for some time and a man of Maciel’s complete trust, began to write on these topics back in 1957 with learned essays such as Mamá Maurita [the unselfish mother], María Neri, the Cotija elementary school teacher,[who put up with Maciel!] and The Margarita, the heroic, generous cow, etc. Besides MM’s collected letters (many of them not written by him), the commissioned writer of Christ is my Life used and freely adapted or copied verbatim complete lines and entire sections from another source. Both the late Fr. Ignacio Mendozas, LC, ingenuous, home-spun, ingratiating personal memoirs, and J. Antonio Villasana’s (now ex-LC) historical essays on Maciiel and the LC were milked. Common background for all of these being the revered, largely apocryphal, Christmas tales, “Historical Outlines (guiones) of the Legion of Christ”. So, in contrast with the purported journalistic “interview” work attributed to Jesus Colina, and contrary to normal interviewing style (cf. Nicolás González Ruiz or John Gunther of old, or Luis Pancorbo -Diálogos italianos- and today’s Vittorio Messori, Oriana Fallaci, Germán Sopena, etc.), the book’s style betrays itself. There are no references whatsoever to any setting, as we usually find in real journalistic interviews, or, for that matter, in Plato’s Dialogues or in the castillian classic Fray Luis de León’s dialogue On the Names of Christ. The so-called long “conversations” and “encounters” between Jesús Colina and Marcial Maciel reveal less credible flesh and blood reality than Juan Bonet’s imaginary interviews as published in Don José, the humoristic magazine directed by the Spaniard Laborde and famous Madrid cartoonist Mingote many years ago.

FALSE MEMORIES, COMPLETE AMNESIA AND FRAUD.

Marcial Maciel’s memory, at his 83 years of age, as previously mentioned, appears too minute and felicitous. Whereas, suddenly, in the middle of the very first part, he has a blackout and states as facts events that never happened: for instance, that cardinal Francis J. Spellman received him and his boys in New York in September 1946. The meeting simply never happened. A minor point? No! Marcial Maciel needed to construct this apparently unimportant anecdote to support the alleged veracity of some false letters he fabricated in 1949 and that he showed to the Jesuits at the University of Comillas. In those false letters Maciel had Cardinal Spellman purportedly saying he would readily take him and his boys into the New York diocese, were they expelled from Comillas. There are three witnesses who can testify to the contrary. For their part, professionals such as Carlos de la Isla (LC 1941-1957), Saul Barrales (LC 1945-1957), Gabriel Cortés Ávila (LC 1943-1959), and others who accompanied Marcial Maciel on the first transatlantic voyage disavow the false story narrated on the very threshold of the “interviews”.

Another blunder: in the first part of the “interview”, taking advantage of certain poorly documented regional reports on the Church-state conflict in Mexico, Marcial Maciel promotes himself as a hero. He portrays himself at age seventeen (!) as the daring leader who enters the local government palace in Orizaba, Veracruz, to mediate between the government forces and an inflamed Catholic crowd… “I was asked to harangue ‘the masses’ from the government palace balcony and to persuade them to calm down and leave” (page 30). What a consoling dream for the psychologically diminished Mexican adolescent who might have seen Mussolini declaim at the central balcony at Palazzo Venezia or the impressive Pius XI on the central loggia of Saint Peter’s Basilica in contemporary film documentaries! It is either pathetic or comical. I refer the reader to the daydreams of the funny character in The Double Life of Walter Mitty by James Thurber. For the rest, simply stated, what a pity there is not one single witness! Maciel makes a vague reference to the doubtful “proof” of a bayonet wound scar. Unfortunately, nobody has ever seen the scar, not even those disciples who were exposed to some of the master’s intimate parts.

What’s more, Maciel suffers total amnesia regarding his innumerable continuous acts of sexual abuse on the many boys he had taken away from their Catholic families “to lead them to the holiness of the priesthood, to save souls and fight Communism in Latin America.” He forgets that for years he performed his pedophile actions, scarcely a forty-minute walk from the Vatican, under the Pope’s very windows. He does not remember the time when in 1959, in Mexico City’s Quinta Pacelli Seminary, faced with the homosexual encounter of two seminarians, he ordered the immediate expulsion of “the active partner” while allowing “the passive partner” to stay¦

Not a word is said about his life-long dependency on morphine. There is nary a memory of that day when the Spanish police followed him from San Sebastián to Salamanca, or of the time when, completely passed out, he almost drowned in a hotel room bathtub in Morocco. Maciel seems to have forgotten the day when an Irish archbishop had to rescue him from the premises of the Dublin Police; they had detained him while he was under the effects of the drug a certain day in the early sixties. Obviously, he has also committed to total oblivion the terrible predicament in which he put several of us, his own seminarians, when in Spain, Italy, France and even in the United States, as he induced some of us to recklessly obtain morphine for him with tricks and lies.

Little reference is made to his use of money: not a word about his illegal transactions in the Spanish money black market of the forties, fifties and sixties. There is total silence about the multiple murky sources of the Legion of Christ’s actual immense wealth.

And why should Maciel recall the early days of June 1949 when in Tlalpan, Mexico, Brother Alfredo Torres and he rehearsed and performed the now famous “gun attack by Communist students”. The brim of the saint’s black hat was punctured several times while his privileged head “miraculously” escaped unscathed. And what about the mysterious death of our companion Francisco Javier Orozco Yépez at Rapallo, near Genoa? Two different versions of his mysterious “accident” were officially imposed, one after the other, on the Legionary student community in Rome. No mention is made either of the desperate suicide of our other friend Jose Luis Fernández. Thoroughly disheartened by his Legionary experience he lost his Christian faith very shortly after leaving the order and took his own life in Russia. What about other suicides occurred in the Legion of Christ? What about our companions sent from Rome to be interned at military doctor Antonio Vallejo Nájera’s mental hospital in Madrid during the fifties and sixties? Nor can Maciel explain why he was banned from entering Venezuela for a period during the middle fifties.

THE VATICAN CONNECTION?

Maciel “talks” of his personal friendship with Pope Paul VI, but draws a blank regarding negative predictions about Cardinal Giovanni Battista Montini’s chances as a possible Sovereign Pontiff during the Conclave that elected him Pope! Not a single phrase describes the circumstances in which the “secret vows” rule (never to criticize a superior and to snitch on any companion who might do so) was predated precisely twenty-five days before his expulsion from Rome by the Vatican in 1956. The exile was imposed scarcely six months after Cardinal Valerio Valeri caught Maciel completely drugged out at the Salvator Mundi Clinic in Rome in April of the very same year 1956!

Talking of Lady Poverty, Maciel forgot to mention the time when in Tangiers, in 1957, he bought, for cash, an exclusive, deluxe, all electric, two- tone Chrysler model of the year. He later chose to justify it as a personal present given to him by Josefita Gómez Delfino, one of his devout benefactors from Caracas, Venezuela. Nor does he mention the Legion’s long tradition of elaborate gifts to powerful Vatican dignitaries.  Nothing is said of the apartment and automobile given to Argentinean Cardinal Eduardo Pironio, Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for Religious, who approved the public version, as opposed to the private/secret one, of the LC Constitutions. And what about the Mercedes Benz cars given as presents to high Vatican officials? Regarding Sister Humility, not a hint about the multimillionaire crypt the LC built for The Founder under the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe on Via Aurelia Nuova. The building contractor happens to be the brother of an influential and prominent Cardinal Sodano.

How does the Founder fare as regards historical fairness and social sensitivity? Marcial Maciel “talks the talk” regarding the Jews. Does he not remember the Hitler eulogy he enthusiastically wrote in one of his letters, snatched from the copier by Fr. Rafael Arumí LC in 1955 in Rome. His frequent praise of the “young members of the admirable Hitler Youth” was evident in the World War II documentaries shown to us repeated times at the Junior Seminary in Cóbreces, Santander. Some of us also witnessed his very ironical, harsh criticism of the Jews in Lugo, Spain, in the early September 1957.

Regarding The Master’s recent flood of deeply spiritual ideas, does he not remember how once he had to ask Brother Alfonso Samaniego, LC, to help him with outlines for his “spiritual talks”. In the early 19 50s it so happened that some Legionary philosophy and theology students from the Gregorian University began to feel queasy at the Inspired One’s evident lack of doctrine.

And what can be said about Maciel’s love of the truth vis-a-vis his special knack for fabricating false letters? An inveterate artist: in 1946 Maciel fabricated and predated letters attributed to Jesuit Father Lucio Rodrigo and addressed to Carmelite Fr. Arcadio Larraona. Two years later the Great Forger produced letters attributed to Cardinal Joseph Spellman and addressed to the Jesuits in Comillas. Later, one, strangely undated, letter and another dated 1996, both attributed to bishop emeritus Polidoro Van Vlierberghe were sent to the Apostolic Delegate in Mexico, Monsignor Luigi Raimondi, and to the staff of the Hartford Courant. All of them possessing the same deceitful intention, pathetic style, incredibly shameless, arrogant self-praise, and, to top it off, even the original typing on our old school Smith Corona number 12 and Remington manual typewriters to fake authenticity.

Those facts are etched in the memory of witnesses and have been collected, attested in duly signed revelations or videotaped testimonies of ex members of the Legion of Christ. They are safely held in bank security boxes for their presentation in due time.  When the judgment opens, what was hidden will appear.

“Judex autem, cum sedebit, quidquid latet apparebit” (When the judge sits in judgment, what was hidden will appear).

On the other hand, during his interviews the aggrieved Father never misses an opportunity to mention here and there how evil persons -usually religious ‘false brethren’- emerged along his life journey who always ‘misunderstood’ him, gratuitously “defamed” him and “lied against” him. Didn’t he refer to the very same thing, too, in his letter from the city of Chihuahua, Mexico, on March 20th, 1953, and on so many other occasions? But faced with these exact questions Marcial Maciel seems to skittishly scamper away like a cat on a hot tin roof.

Knowing Maciel’s personal modus operandi, and his creative gifts, one might predict right now that, if it suited him, he and his official spokesmen could very soon show ‘notarized letters’ to the public attesting to his “true authorship” of the “interview book”. The same previous experience with the man and his twisted manners allows us to foresee immediate denial and new lies of different sorts. Inveterate liars are quite resourceful.

Nevertheless, we should not disregard these “interviews” by simply stating we definitely suspect they never occurred, and change the topic. No! Because many people of good faith cannot distinguish truth from falsehood in cases like this. The book should rather be researched and studied as a double impersonation: that of someone -as we suspect, most likely, Fr. Javier Garcia LC- playing “the journalist” and ghost writer, and the other, that of Marcial Maciel himself, impersonating a saintly follower of Christ. “Christ is my Life”: a bold and offensive title for the life and thoughts of a man who, according to so many written revelations and oral testimonies, has betrayed the most elementary virtues. Christ had harsh words for the Scribes and Pharisees.

THE ‘JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE’

Why all this farce? Independent readers, please consider the strength and economy of “the juxtaposition principle”. This is largely based on the lack of due analysis of carefully crafted images of someone or something that takes advantage of his or its appearance. Maciel identifies himself with men, groups, societies, institutions and objects whose nature, prestige the uncritical mind will associate him favorably. The favorable elements with which he associates himself are legion: a saintly uncle bishop, a Cristero War guerrilla fighter uncle, a former Secretary of Education as the main guest speaker at a dinner where Maciel is going to receive public recognition, a favorable photograph in which Maciel is being undeservedly embraced by His Holiness Pope John Paul LL, a famous personal phrase that Pius XII never said to him in a meeting that never took place, the lecture given by a former government press director, whose portraits will look at you from the corridor walls of one LC university for entire months, the visit of an innocent member of royalty exploited to the maximum in LC propaganda pamphlets, etc. Simply stated- it is a chameleon-like exercise metaphorized from the animal planet to the social and moral worlds. It is a practical principle, which requires no great intelligence or energy, and certainly no scruples, to apply, while in our undemanding, careless milieu it harvests spectacular “results”. But clearly, for men who want to be more than worth their salt and really save their souls, it belongs to the land of pure opinion, not to the realm of true judgment. The final verdict from above is God’s. Indeed, but we, while on this earth, as citizens, for our own social preservation, have the right, nay the duty, to judge. And responsible moral investigation should be conducted in an open, honest, well-organized manner.

Because Marcial Maciel has always relied so much on the power of images, he in some way anticipated Marshall McLuhan’s theory that “the medium is the message” or Andy Warhol’s dictum that “the appearance is all”. In the same sense Maciel had perfect insight into the power of the movies’ “Kolokoff effect” (you “are” what you seem to be). Thus, Marcial Maciel is a perfect postmodern man. Particularly when most of his followers are just eager to believe what they have already been indoctrinated into. The Latin Vulgate version of the Biblie says “Vulgus vult decipi” (˜The masses want to be deceived). And Maciel has had the magic touch to make people see themselves as an Elite, while an outside independent observer can see how he manipulates them as members of a very convenient uncritical mass. Maciel’s book illustrates, besides, this sad truth: people have a very short historical memory. That is why he and the Legion of Christ can deform events with impunity and freely use old-fashioned tactics that the Nazis and Italian Fascists schemed and used successfully seventy years ago. And do so even in countries, like the United States, which fought those foes of yore, or like Spain that suffered the effects of their tyranny. Marcial Maciel’s psyche got deformed precisely at that time, and his scarce, scattered, disorganized readings left in his undeniable natural intuition the tempting taste of fast, easy recipes to capture submissive consecrated minds.

Some people will say that there are “great thinkers” in the Marcial Maciel camp and among Legion of Christ defenders. Embarrassingly enough, Benito Mussolini, too, had his Giovanni Gentile in his day. In fact, we must expect that the same way as the book we are commenting was created, likewise a chorus of well-orchestrated, friendly, “independent” reviewers will very soon begin to be heard. Like dolphins around the triumphant vessel, they will leap in praise of the “depth and amplitude of thought”, the “simple directness”, the “lucid patriarchal wisdom”, etc. of the never sufficiently praised Marcial Maciel.

This marvelous “juxtaposition principle” will be applied time and time again. The same also should be noted with the frequent mention of Vatican personalities, past and present, particularly the late Pope Paul VI, who, “even as a Pope, used to receive me whenever I asked him.”(!) (Page 184). This brings back Marcial Maciel’s most daring classic “naive” story. His self-cultivated legend tells how on his first trip to Rome in 1946, after a formal ceremony at Saint Peter’s Basilica, Pope Pius XII personally gave Maciel -then an obscure twenty-six-year-old priest- a private appointment just twenty-four hours after bumping into him for the first time (page 50).

Readers should continue to consider the fruits of “the juxtaposition principle”: Christ said that “the children of Darkness are more astute than the children of Light”. Despite his now internationally known crimes, Maciel has managed to survive thus far, not only without punishment but even with pomp and circumstance. And done so for a longer time than several infamous men of the past. They fell because of their many personal, hidden weaknesses, their injustice, for social reasons and historical conditions, and for several important tactical mistakes of a varied nature. Their greatest mistake was, however: THEY DID NOT HIDE BEHIND THE CHURCH, THE ALTAR, OR THE POPE; this being the most productive juxtaposition of all!

And yet, the fact remains that truth is stubborn by nature, and will come out eventually. To conclude this unorthodox review and commentary, and in order not to ‘appear’ less informed than Marcial Maciel’s ghost writer, let me cite a recent speech by John C. Byrd, democratic senator for West Virginia and dean of the American Congress. The speech, which I invite you to read complete, begins with these words of ancient and perennial value:

“Truth, in spite of all the attempts to suffocate it, has the means to reaffirm itself. Distortion affects it only for a while. No matter to what extremes we, humans, go so as to obscure facts, to deceive our neighbors, truth always finds the way to get through the cracks and reemerge in the long run.”

In other words -and returning now to the opening subtitle of this book review and commentary- in the end truth manages to fill in all the holes of this Swiss cheese of questionable origin.

The Literary Analyst

Fr. Maciel Is Disciplined by the Holy See: What Will the Legionaries Do Now?

By Dale Vree
Dale Vree is Editor of New Oxford Review.

Fr. Marcial Maciel, the founder of the Legionaries of Christ, is probably the most prominent priest to be disciplined by the Catholic Church for homosexual predation, that is, pederasty. Former Legionary Juan Vaca sent the first petition to the Holy See in 1976. He identified himself and 20 others as victims of Maciel’s homosexual activity. It took 30 years for the case to be resolved. The case was reopened in 2004 by Cardinal Ratzinger of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF). Ratzinger sent Msgr. Charles Scicluna to investigate the matter. According to John L. Allen Jr., the ace Vatican correspondent, Msgr. Scicluna gave the number of accusers as “more than 20, but less than 100” (NCRonline.org, May 18, 2006).

The official communiqué for the CDF on May 19, 2006, said in part: “Beginning in 1998, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith received accusations, already partly made public, against Fr. Marcial Maciel…for crimes that fall under the exclusive competence of the congregation…. After having attentively studied the results of the investigation, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith…decided — bearing in mind Fr. Maciel’s advanced age and his delicate health — to forgo a canonical hearing and to invite the father to a reserved life of penitence and prayer, relinquishing any form of public ministry. The Holy Father approved these decisions.”

The Legionaries and Regnum Christi (the Legion’s lay affiliate) followed with an official statement on May 19, which said in part: “Facing the accusations made against him [Maciel], he declared his innocence and, following the example of Jesus Christ, decided not to defend himself in any way.”

The Church certainly does allow for self-defense, so it’s obvious that Maciel could not defend himself. And if Maciel was “following the example of Jesus Christ,” who were the villains? The Sanhedrin, the Pharisees? In this melodrama, the villains can only be the Holy See.

Moreover, Jesus was not accused of sexually violating innocent boys. If Maciel really wanted to follow Jesus, he would do as Jesus says: “Whoever causes one of the little ones who believes in Me to stumble, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were thrown into the sea” (Mk. 9:42). Oh no, not that!

As for “following the example of Jesus Christ,” and deciding “not to defend himself in any way”: When the Hartford Courant in 1997 accused Maciel of molesting boys, Maciel’s lawyers threatened legal action against the newspaper. Was this following the example of Jesus Christ? It’s so obvious that Maciel could not defend himself against the Holy See.

The Legionaries’ statement also said that this is “a new cross that God, the Father of Mercy, has allowed him [Maciel] to suffer and that will obtain many graces for the Legion of Christ and the Regnum Christi Movement.” Fr. Owen Kearns, a Legionary priest and Publisher and Editor-in-Chief of the National Catholic Register (controlled by the Legionaries), said in an Editorial in the Register (May 28-June 3): “We are not afraid of this cross — on the contrary, we are honored by it.” Oh, really? Kearns has been the point man defending Maciel against charges of pederasty.

Kearns continues: “If you pray for the Legionaries, don’t pray that this cup be taken away, pray that we be worthy of drinking it to the dregs.” This is a play on the words of Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane: “O My Father, if it is possible let this cup pass from Me; nevertheless, not as I will, but as You will” (Mt. 26:39; also Mk. 14:36 and Lk. 22:42).

Does Maciel consider himself to be a messianic figure? Certainly his followers do. Maciel even surpasses Christ when Kearns says, “Don’t pray that this cup be taken away” (Jesus says, “if it is possible let this cup pass from Me”), and Kearns says, “pray that we be worthy of drinking it to the dregs” (whereas Jesus says, “not as I will, but as You will”). Is Maciel greater than Christ?

Neither the Legionaries’ statement nor Kearns’s Editorial contained a hint of mea culpa. The Legionaries and Regnum Christi have been called cults, and their response would certainly indicate that. Only a zombie would believe what the Legionaries’ statement and Kearns’s Editorial say. The Legionaries and Regnum Christi were founded on a lie, a monumental lie. Of course, we would assume that most Legionaries and Regnum Christi members are not zombies. They were duped and betrayed, and we must feel compassion for them.

Because of Maciel’s “advanced age [86] and delicate health” (which is common for elderly clerical sex abusers), he was not subjected to a canonical trial. He was lucky to get off so easily, considering the dastardly crimes he committed. It was a settlement out of court, something like a plea-bargain. If it had gone to a canonical trial, Maciel would likely have been defrocked.

All this talk about Maciel’s “cross” and his “cup” is just hocus-pocus. Jesus was crucified; Maciel was not. Jesus was innocent; Maciel is not.

The communiqué from the CDF also said: “Independently of the person of the Founder, the worthy apostolate of the Legionaries of Christ and of the Association Regnum Christi is gratefully recognized” (italics added). This would indicate that the Holy See wants the Legionaries and Regnum Christi to separate themselves from Maciel. However, the Legionaries’ statement said: “The Legionaries of Christ and the members of Regnum Christi, following the example of Fr. Maciel and united to him…” (italics added). There will be no “independence” from Maciel. The Legionaries and Regnum Christi are Fr. Maciel; they consider him a “living saint.” Go to the Legion centers and you’ll find a picture of Maciel next to a picture of Christ. Maciel is highly charismatic, and, from several accounts, is thought to be a megalomaniac.

In Kearns’s Editorial he says: “The Legionaries will…accompany their founder [Maciel] in his new stage of his life…. We love and trust Pope Benedict. We do not question his decision or his wisdom.” But Kearns says Maciel will be “vindicated,” and refers to Maciel’s “cross.” So obviously Kearns does question Pope Benedict’s wisdom. The Legionaries’ statement also said that they “accept and will accept always the directives of the Holy See with profound spirit of obedience and faith”; but they also say Maciel is “innocent.” The Legionaries cannot make a martyr of Maciel and then give fidelity to the Holy See with “faith.” You can see why the Legionaries are known for their Machiavellian stratagems. But it’s an outright contradiction. No doubt some of the Legionaries and Regnum Christi members will fall for this.

By the way, after Kearns’s Editorial on Maciel — this being the biggest story affecting the Legion-controlled Register — there were no letters to the Editor, pro or con, in the Register. Hush, hush!

It’s clear that the Legionaries are still loyal to Maciel. This is flat-out defiance. The Holy See will quietly have to get rid of the leaders of the Legionaries. This is the Holy See’s test. Moreover, it’s hard to imagine that the culture of cronyism and dishonesty does not extend to other leaders of the Legionaries as well.

The best friends of the Legionaries in the U.S. were the neoconservatives. The usual neocon suspects rallied to Maciel’s defense against the pederasty charges. They included Deal Hudson, William Donohue, Richard John Neuhaus, and Mary Ann Glendon. More oblique were George Weigel and William Bennett. Boy, do these neocons have egg on their faces.

The accusers of Maciel were vilified and scorned. For example, in First Things (March 2002), Neuhaus called the accusations — and therefore the accusers — just about everything in the book: “slanderous attacks,” “malicious gossip,” “vicious gossip,” “repugnant,” “muck,” “false and malicious” (twice), “detraction,” “slander,” “calumny,” and “odious.” Of the neocons (as far as we know) only Neuhaus was still defending Maciel after the Vatican communiqué (on the First Things website, May 19, and on The New York Times website, May 19). Neuhaus went to great lengths to defend Maciel, and he must realize that much of his credibility is on the line. Yes, it’s hard to admit when one is wrong. But, Fr. Neuhaus, you were wrong.

Lo and behold, Fr. Neuhaus did admit he was wrong — for all intents and purposes — in First Things (Aug./Sept.). Well, good for him.

The Church owes the accusers a debt of gratitude and appreciation: Maciel has ruined or distorted the lives of many boys. Maciel has in effect been found guilty, and justice has been done (and so has mercy).

As you know, the NOR has told you what’s wrong with Maciel and the Legionaries for years, and we’ve gotten many cancelations and nonrenewals because of it. (We’ve also printed many letters defending Maciel and the Legionaries — it’s tempting to reveal all their names, but we won’t.) Yes, the truth can sometimes be hard to take. But you can trust us to tell the unpleasant truths and inconvenient facts. We can’t think of any other orthodox Catholic periodical that told you the truth about Maciel — that is, before the Holy See’s communiqué.

We know all about the unreliable, unprincipled, or unscrupulous people on the other side. In addition to that, we tell you about those on our side. As our Lord said, there will be false messiahs and false prophets who will perform deeds so great as to deceive the elect (to paraphrase Mt. 24:24). Surely, you don’t want to be deceived.

We again plead with you for your support. The NOR is not a knee-jerk, ideological magazine, and that’s why we are not funded by knee-jerk, ideological foundations. If you want a Pavlovian magazine, the NOR is not for you. But if you are an intelligent person, you want the uncompromised truth, and that’s what we give you at the NOR.

We are funded by our subscribers. As you know, as of last September, we’ve been trying to raise $176,000 (so far we have reached $111,145). Much of what we’re asking for is for our reconstructed website (where you can subscribe or renew — or make a donation — by credit card). At present our website is a huge financial drain. We hope that in time it will pay for itself. At our website, you will find our Archives, our Ad Gallery, NOR Dossiers, our En Español section, the NOR Gear Shoppe, our New Oxford News Link, and the current issue. Some are free and some you have to pay for. For an additional $10 annual fee above the print subscription price, you get everything. (That access, however, may only be ordered online with a credit card; we do not accept online-access orders at the office.) Our Forum is up and running, so online subscribers can post their comments relating to what they’ve read in the magazine and at our website.

Why is the website so important? Because young people spend enormous amounts of time on the Internet, and it goes without saying that young people are the future of orthodox Catholicism and the NOR. Do something for our young people! Do something for yourself.

So please do help us achieve our modest fundraising goal by sending your donation to: New Oxford Review, 1069 Kains Ave., Berkeley CA 94706. The New Oxford Review is a nonprofit entity and has 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status with the Internal Revenue Service. Donations are therefore tax deductible to the extent allowed by law. Checks are to be made out to New Oxford Review. Credit card donations can also be made at our website.

To Pope Benedict XVI: This Church is all of us.

To Pope Benedict XVI: This Church is all of us.
By Ruth Bertels

Somehow, it seems to me that Pope Benedict XVI is already into the second act of his papacy. The first weeks were simply a flash-back to the days before and during Pope John Paul II’s final illness.

The then Cardinal Ratzinger delivered a Good Friday homily guaranteed to make everyone in the Vatican sit up and take notice of the dire straits in which the Church found herself. Not just anyone is asked to give the Good Friday homily. It is a distinct honor, and, therefore, carries a good deal of weight. Ratzinger was up to the challenge. Or was he?

A Vatican homily is meant, not only for the Curia and the members of the hierarchy present, it circles the globe in minutes, leaving either chaos or the peace of Christ in its wake.

Chances are, Ratzinger’s words did more than astonish his listeners; they may well have caused deep-seated sadness in the hearts and minds of ordinary Catholics on Main Street, Anywhere-in-the-World. Jason Berry reported the harsh judgment in the New York Times:

How much filth there is in the church, and even among those who, in the priesthood, ought to belong entirely to God.

Later, he compared the Church to a boat about to sink, taking in water on every side.

Here, Ratzinger appears distraught over the scandals that have rocked the Church, though one cannot help but wonder why, since they have been in the Vatican files since 1993, but dismissed by him as a planned campaign by the news media to discredit the church.

Somehow, Ratzinger appears to have forgotten that this is a mighty big Church of ours, a holy Church, a Church of sinners, yes, but, also, of millions of everyday saints, whose names will never guarantee them a Mercedes limo if invited to Rome, nor dining in the finest restaurants, nor a private audience with Pope Benedict XVI.

Yet, it is these people who staff the soup kitchens, keep vigil for the dying, do the volunteer work that keeps parishes going year-round, support the Vatican, and lift the spirits of their fellow pilgrims by their courage and humility, patience and perseverance. They give us joy in the morning and peace at even-tide. They are the Church.

What might be upsetting the new pope, Berry tells us, is the case he recently reopened against Rev. Marcial Maciel Degollado, a powerful Mexican priest who founded his own order and lives in the seminary in Rome.

Berry goes on to say that in 1998, when Ratzinger was head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, a legal tribunal of the congregation accepted a case by nine seminarians who accused Father Maciel, founder of the Legionaries of Christ, of sexual assault, an allegation that first surfaced in the 1960’s. (Please refer to the articles in the Archives: Vows of Silence.)

In 1999, Ratzinger told a Mexican bishop that it was not “prudent” to proceed against a man who had helped the church by attracting young men to the priesthood.

However, since Ratzinger reopened the case, Berry asks, “Why?” Was it because he thought that he might be pope one day, and wouldn’t want the case clouding his standing before the world?

Since the Vatican is an independent country, it may be easy for those living and working there to be lulled into a false sense of security, far from the eyes and questions of the ordinary folks in ordinary little and big towns. How else can one explain the congratulatory, lengthy letter sent by Pope John Paul II to Marcial Maciel on the anniversary of his ordination, November 24, 2004?
Here is a brief quote from it:

Your 69 years of priestly life, Reverend Father, have been characterized by significant spiritual and missionary fecundity with different apostolic works and activities, such as the Regnum Christi Movement …

I cannot, of course, forget the service that you have rendered in these years to the Holy See, which has made use – on several occasions and in different ways – of your generous and competent collaboration, whether on the occasion of some of my apostolic trips, or in the activity of organizations of the Roman Curia.

Personally, it is impossible for me to doubt that Ratzinger cleared this letter, especially considering the poor health of the pope at the time. What was Ratzinger thinking? Didn’t he understand that the message would see the light of day and cause scandal upon scandal? Because he is so brilliant, does he consider the little people so ignorant they would not be repulsed at the sight of a founder of a religious order, accused of molesting nine seminarians, receiving accolades from the Holy Father?

I’m sorry. I just don’t understand this.

A number of times, the pope has said he would favor a smaller Church, implying one where the faithful were unquestioningly faithful. The problem is that this is not his Church; it is Christ’s Church, and the Church is all of us. Jesus told his apostles to feed his lambs and sheep. Not only the ones who stay quietly on the hillside, but those who wander off, especially those who wander off, and must be rescued by an alert, caring shepherd.

Some have said we must be willing to give Pope Benedict XVI a chance. That we are most willing to do. But in turn, we ask him to give us a chance, a chance to find peace and respect and love within the Church that belongs to all of us. Amen.

Maciel Praise Provokes Two New Testimonies: Victim And His Wife Speak Out

DOS TESTIMONIOS NUEVOS -Bilingue/Bilingual article

 

By Ma Esther Zatarain de González & Francisco González Parga

 

An effort to publicly defend and praise Legion of Christ Founder
Marcial Maciel, discrediting the recent Vatican statement, provokes two new testimonies: the victim’s and his wife’s

Una declaración laudatoria en defensa de Marcial Maciel, y en descrédito del rigor de la sentencia del Vaticano en su contra, provoca la publicación de dos nuevos testimonios de abuso: el de la victima y el de su esposa.

This article contains two letters written in response to an article called DISCOVER THE TRUTH which appeared in the Mexican newspaper “El Mural” towards the end of May, 2006, praising Marcial Maciel as “a good, upright and faithful man.â€� The first letter was written by the spouse of an ex-Legionary sexually abused as a seminarian by Fr. Maciel. The second, written by the victim himself, was published in the daily news paper “EL INFORMADOR” in Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico. We are including the English version of Legion co-founder Francisco Gonzalez Parga’s letter, already cited in the Wanderer article to include last minute corrections by the author.

Este articulo contiene dos cartas escritas como respuesta a un artículo llamado DESCUBRE LA VERDAD aparecido en EL MURAL a fines de mayo del 2006 donde se alaba a Marcial Maciel como “un hombre bueno, íntegro y fiel�. La primera carta fue escrita por la esposa de un ex-Legionario abusado sexualmente por el Padre Maciel

 

FRANCISCO GONZALEZ-PARGA’S 19 YEAR CAREER WITH THE LEGION OF CHRIST

From July, 1951 [AGED 11] to December, 1970

1. APOSTOLIC:
Tlalpam, MEXICO: July, 1951 to July, 1954
Ontaneda, SPAIN: July, 1954 to July, 1955

2. POSTULANTCY: Summer vacations, 1955

3. NOVITIATE: September, 1955 to September, 1957

4. PREFECT OF POSTULANTS: Summer, 1957; in the same group as Fr. Mariano de Blas, Fr. Blásquez, Bonifacio Padilla and Raúl de Anda.

5. JUNIORATE: September, 1957 to September, 1959

6. SUPERIOR STUDIES, ROME
-PHILOSOPHY: September, 1959 to September, 1962.
-THEOLOGY: Degree, September, 1962 to September, 1965.
Simultaneously Assistant to the Master of Novices in Ireland from 1962 to 1965 while alternating months of work in the novitiate with months of study in Rome.
-DOCTORATE IN THEOLOGY: September, 1965 to September, 1968.
-On July 7, 1966 I was ordained a priest and joined the Vatican as part of the Sacred Congregation for Bishops until June, 1969.
Concurrent with my doctoral studies and work in the Vatican, I served as Prefect of Studies for legionary seminarians: From 1665 to 1966 I was prefect of studies for philosophy and from 1966 to 1969 I was prefect of studies for theology.

7. EXILE IN IRELAND: July, 1969 to December, 1970

8. LEAVING: I escaped from the college in Rome in a taxi on December 29, 1970.


TESTIMONY FROM THE VICTIM’S WIFE

Maria-Esther Zatarain de González, Attorney-at-Law

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, May 28, 2006

To: Fr. Juan Pedro Oriol

Dear Father:

I take the liberty of writing this letter, although I do not know you personally, only because I saw your critique of the film “The Da Vinci Code� in the newspaper. My attention was drawn to the beginning of the article where you dedicate it to “Father Marcial Maciel: a good, upright and faithful man.� This description penetrated to the depths of my heart because you are not portraying this man truthfully. Is he good when he has abused more than 100 adolescent boys, and even children, whom he had recruited to religious life? Upright, when — from what I know of him — he has been living a double life on a permanent basis for decades? Do you believe this after all the aberrant acts of which he is so rightly accused? Faithful? To whom? To the pope who covers for him, to the Legionaries who serve and worship him, or more aptly to himself? But certainly he is neither good, nor upright, nor faithful to God. No! God saw everything he did. God cannot be mocked and God is asking him to account for his crimes. Even Maciel will have to come face to face with Him in a tribunal where neither his age nor his delicate state of health will matter. And probably very soon, precisely because his age.

I say this to you knowing perfectly well what I am talking about, since I am the wife of one of Maciel’s victims. I will briefly tell you what I have experienced as a result of this abuse, of this assassination of a pure soul, who never imagined he would find himself with a sexual pervert, who would brand him for life.

When I met my husband, approximately thirty-three years ago, I began to get to know him, I began to love him. Little by little he told me about his life. He told me in broad terms how, when he was fifteen years old (he is now sixty-five), Fr. Marcial Maciel had abused him in a school the Legionaries ran in Ontaneda, Spain. I understood that he wanted to be sincere and wanted to tell me all about his past so that we could enter into matrimony without any secrets. I already knew that he had been a priest. However, I never imagined the horrible events that drove him to abandon the priesthood, nor the consequences and long term effects they had on his personality. And so, while I certainly was disturbed and it troubled me to find out about this, we continued with our relationship, got married and everything seemed normal. However, he always seemed sad, extremely tired, and became exhausted very easily.

In the first year we were married, he developed a very serious urological condition and was on the verge of death. He spent six months as a patient in a Mexico City hospital with a horrible infection.

When that was over, he remained sad and was sick with other complaints. He suffered from serious insomnia. Entire weeks passed during which he did not sleep. He was in a permanent state of depression. Whenever he heard something regarding Fr. Maciel, he would become very nervous, very angry, lose control. His mouth would go dry, his stomach would hurt and his digestion was affected.

I understood that the illnesses and the depression were a result of the abuse, but he always fought against them and tried to overcome them so he could move on, carrying out his duties at the various jobs he had. For several years he gave courses in human relations. He later opened a consulting firm and taught as a professor at ITESO until — because of his poor health and exhaustion — there came a point were everything came to a halt.

After that I spent several years taking care of all the household expenses, his doctors and his medications. I had to work very hard. In addition to attending to him, caring for him, and cheering him up, I was also studying for my law degree.

On various occasions during this period, when his internal anguish led to anemia as a result of digestive problems, and insomnia, my husband sought treatment from psychologists and alternative medicine. Most of the income we had at that time went to pay the psychologist, who was not in the habit of reducing his fees and was very expensive.

So, Father, you have to realize that for someone who has been through the hell we lived through because of someone else’s fault, it is very hard to remain calm when I hear that this fiend is considered a saint, an irreproachable man, “an example and guide for youth�, or “a good, upright and faithful man.� It is not envy, Father, but rather indignation at seeing Satan’s carefully hatched plan work so well, trapping many innocents in the clutches of the perfectly disguised agent he sent dressed in lamb’s clothing (under the appearance of a saint dressed in a cassock). And it is sad to see that men of good will such as yourself have fallen prey, are unable to see because their eyes are blindfolded, and who nevertheless come to the predator’s defense, thereby becoming his accomplices.

I am an attorney and I know the difference between a witness and a victim. Maciel has simple misled you and all those who defend him into thinking he was a good person. You are, to use a legal term, “hearsay witnesses�. If I were you, Father, I would be careful going about praising this demon cloaked in light who calls truth a lie and lying the truth. If I were you I would investigate, ask, examine, so that when God calls you to render an account, you do not say, “Well, I thought . . . Well, everyone said . . ., They were only sins of youth . . ., Many priests do the same thing and they never did anything for the Church�, etc., etc. All such arguments will be useless before God.

On the other hand I want to tell you that, yes, God is good and, yes, he is faithful, and one day God had mercy on my husband and sent us a holy person who helped us get to know the Word of God, helped us make our peace with God, helped us see Jesus Christ as the only gateway to salvation and liberation. Little by little God himself, like a loving father, began binding my husband’s wounds, began healing his heart. And I can tell you with certainty that my husband has already forgiven Maciel, and even prays for him so that God may have mercy on him and help him seek repentance before it is too late.

Father, I truly wish that God imbues you with a special spirit — a spirit of revelation- that would allow you to know the truth, and that truth might set you free (as Christ said) and make you happy (as you say in your article).

Affectionately yours and with the love that Christ has put in my heart,

María-Esther de González
Attorney-at-Law

(Translation by REGAIN staff)

###

[Carta original]

DE LA ESPOSA DE LA VICTIMA

Lic. Ma. Esther de González.
Guadalajara, Jal., 28 de Mayo del 2006.

Sr. Juan Pedro Oriol
P r e s e n t e

Estimado Padre:

Me permito escribirle esta carta, aunque no lo conozco, solamente porque vi en el periódico una crítica que hace usted a la película “El Código Da Vinci”. Lo que me llamó la atención es al principio del artículo que usted lo dedica al “Padre Marcial Maciel, hombre bueno, íntegro y fiel”. Estos epítetos me calaron en lo más hondo de mi corazón porque no está usted calificando verazmente a ese señor. ¿Es Bueno, cuando abusó de más de 100 muchachos adolescentes y aún niños que él había reclutado para la vida religiosa? ¿Ã�ntegro, cuando, por lo que sé de él, ha estado viviendo una doble vida de forma permanente, por décadas? ¿lo cree usted después de todos esos actos aberrantes de que se le acusa con verdad? ¿Fiel? ¿A quién? ¿al Papa que lo encubre, a los Legionarios que lo sirven y lo idolatran?, o más bien, ¿a sí mismo? Pero ciertamente, ni bueno, ni integro ni fiel para con Dios ¡NO! Dios vio todo lo que él hizo, pero de Dios nadie se burla y Dios ya le está pidiendo cuenta de sus crímenes, pero aún Maciel tendrá que enfrentarse cara a cara con Él en un tribunal donde no se tendrá en cuenta ni su edad, ni su delicado estado de salud. Y, esto, lo más probable es que muy pronto, debido precisamente a su edad.

Le digo todo esto con todo conocimiento de causa, pues yo soy esposa de una de las víctimas de Maciel y brevemente le voy a contar lo que yo viví como fruto de ese abuso, de ese asesinato de un alma limpia que nunca se imaginó encontrarse con un perverso homosexual que lo marcaría para toda su vida.

Cuando yo conocí a mi esposo, hace aproximadamente 33 años, lo empecé a tratar, lo empecé a amar, poco a poco me fue él contando su vida, me dijo a grandes rasgos que cuando él tenía 15 años (ahora tiene 65), el padre Marcial Maciel había abusado de él en un Colegio que tienen los Legionarios en Ontaneda, España.

Entendí que él quería ser sincero conmigo y quería contarme todo su pasado para entrar al matrimonio sin ningún secreto. Yo ya sabía que él había sido sacerdote, sin embargo nunca me imaginé los horribles hechos que lo habían orillado a dejar el sacerdocio, ni las secuelas y consecuencias que habían dejado en su personalidad. Así que, aunque ciertamente me molestó, y me inquietó el conocerlos, seguimos con nuestra relación, nos casamos, y todo parecía normal; sin embargo, lo veía siempre triste, muy cansado, se agotaba con mucha facilidad.

En el primer año de casados, se enfermó gravemente de la uretra y estuvo a punto de morir. Duró 6 meses internado en un hospital de la ciudad de México con una infección tremenda.

Cuando salimos de esa, él seguía triste, enfermo de otras cosas, padecía graves insomnios, semanas enteras no dormía, en una palabra, estaba en depresión permanente, y cuando oía algo sobre el Padre Maciel se ponía muy nervioso, muy alterado, fuera de control, se le sacaba la boca, le dolía el estómago y le afectaba en su proceso de digestión.

Yo entendí que las enfermedades y la depresión venían desde el abuso, pero él siempre luchó y se sobreponía para seguir adelante, cumpliendo con los diversos trabajos que tuvo; durante varios años estuvo dando cursos de relaciones humanas, luego abrió un despacho de consejería y dio clases como profesor en el ITESO, hasta que por su estado de salud y agotamiento, llegó el momento en que no pudo ya trabajar.

Entonces yo tuve que enfrentarme por varios años a todos los gastos de la casa, sus doctores y sus medicinas. Tenía que trabajar muy duro. Pues además de que tenía que atenderlo, cuidarlo y animarlo, estaba estudiando mi licenciatura en derecho.

En varias ocasiones durante ese período, cuando su angustia interior declinaba en anemia, por la falta de digestión y los insomnios, mi marido buscó la ayuda en tratamientos con psicólogos, y en la medicina alternativa. La mayor parte de los ingresos económicos que entonces teníamos, iban para el Psicólogo que habitualmente no hacía reducción en sus tarifas y era muy caro.
Así que, padre, debe darse cuenta de que para quien ha vivido ese infierno que nosotros vivimos, por culpa de otro, es muy difícil mantener la calma al escuchar que a ese otro malvado, lo tienen como un santo, un hombre intachable, “como un ejemplo y guía de la juventud”, o como, “un hombre bueno, integro y fielâ€�. Y no es envidia, padre, es indignación al ver la obra de Satanás tan perfectamente urdida para que muchos inocentes caigan en las garras del agente perfectamente camuflado que él ha enviado, vestido con piel de oveja (con apariencia de santo y con sotana) y es tristeza, al ver como hombres de buena voluntad como Ud. han caído y están incapacitados para ver, pues tienen los ojos vendados, pero aún así se prestan para salir en defensa del depredador, haciéndose sus cómplices.

Yo soy abogada, yo sé lo que es un testigo y una víctima, a usted y a todos los que defienden a Maciel, no les hizo nada mas que engañarlos de que era una buena persona, ustedes son “testigos de oídas”, como se dice en Derecho, pero yo que usted padre, tendría cuidado de andar ponderando a ese demonio que se viste de luz, que llama a la verdad mentira y a la mentira verdad. Yo que usted investigaba, preguntaba, indagaba, no sea que Dios también a usted le pida cuentas y le tenga que responder: “pues yo creía. . . ., pues todo mundo decía. . . . , total, pecados de juventud, a muchos sacerdotes les pasa y ellos no han hecho nada por la Iglesia, etc. etc. Todos esos argumentos no le van a valer ante Dios.

Por otro lado le quiero decir, que Dios sí es bueno y él sí es fiel y un día Dios tuvo misericordia de mi esposo y nos envió una persona santa que nos llevó al conocimiento de la Palabra de Dios, nos llevó a hacer nuestra paz con Dios, nos llevó a ver a Jesucristo como la única puerta para nuestra salvación y nuestra liberación. Poco a poco Dios mismo, como un padre amoroso, fue restaurando las heridas de mi esposo, fue sanando su corazón, y le puedo decir con toda certeza, que ya perdonó a Maciel y hasta ora por él para que Dios tenga misericordia de él y lo ayude a buscar el arrepentimiento antes de que sea demasiado tarde.

Padre, de verdad deseo que Dios ponga en usted un espíritu especial, un espíritu de revelación que le haga conocer la verdad y que esa verdad lo haga libre (como dice Cristo) y feliz (como dice usted en su artículo).

Lo saludo con afecto y con el amor que Cristo ha puesto en mi corazón

Lic. Ma. Esther de González.

Telephone number withheld by REGAIN editor

***

TESTIMONY FROM THE VICTIM

To Fr. Juan Pedro Oriol, LC, &
Jorge Suárez Huizar and Arturo Lucke Gracián, esquires.

I read your review of the film, “The Da Vinci Code,� and I am in complete agreement. However, I was struck by your comment in which, on the one hand, regarding Fr. Marcial Maciel, you refer to him as “a good, upright and loyal man.� On the other hand, you suggest to your readers that they “always seek to discover the truth because only through truth are they made free and happy.�

In the same spirit of love for the truth which you recommend, I wish to inform you that I was a priest of the Legionaries of Christ. In the twenty years devoted to work and study when I belonged to the Legion, I obtained a degree in philosophy and a doctorate in theology from the Gregorian University and was Prefect of Studies at the Legionaries of Christ College of Higher Studies in Rome.

Now in the spirit of helping you also to find the truth, I want you to know that at a young age I was a victim of outright sexual abuse, perpetrated in a deceitful and premeditated way, by Fr. Maciel. For this reason and in spite of having been ordained a priest in Rome by then Pope Paul VI [From the author’s soon to be published testimony: “I was ordained a priest in July 1966 by Pope Paul VI in the Basilica of St. Peter in Rome.”], I felt compelled to abandon the Legion and the priesthood, taking with me all the moral and psychological damage that you might imagine. For many years I have lived with illness, have been in danger of losing my life, and have experienced continual depression as a result of the abuse committed against my person by Fr. Maciel. Even now I am suffering from the consequences.

But this is only my story. What about the 100 or more cases reported under sworn oath to the Holy See? I have since forgiven Fr. Maciel and I hope that God enlightens him and helps him to acknowledge the grave sin he has committed against those who were his victims and their families, against society and against those Legionaries of Christ who remain members in good faith of the congregation.

I am addressing you publicly because I am outraged by such deceit, falsehood and lies, and because it pains me to know that there are so many people who refuse to accept the truth and still others who “impede truth through injustice.� For some reason they have a need not to want to “search for� the truth or to even “see it.� Otherwise, they would realize that, if Pope Benedict XVI felt obliged for reasons of conscience to take such drastic action against Fr. Maciel by retiring him from all public practice of his priestly ministry, it is because there was sufficient evidence for him to do so — in spite of the dishonor such an act could bring to the Catholic Church, to the person of Pope John Paul II and to his own person, and in spite of the damage this could cause not only to the credibility of the Legionaries of Christ and to the Regnum Christi Movement, but also to the economic, political and social advantages these institutions bring to the Vatican and the Holy See.

It is the opinion of many thinking people that the slight punishment imposed on Fr. Maciel by the pope is the result of a conflict of interests arising out of the above-mentioned advantages the Legion provides to the Vatican and to the papacy. Therefore, instead of trying him for atrocious sexual crimes and abuse of power committed against so many young candidates for the priesthood, they have hidden him from public view so that he may live in comfortable opulence, attended by his unconditionally loyal servants from the Legion. He does so in light of the pope’s recommendation that he use his time for prayer and penitence. Fr. Maciel will need prayer and penitence because God cannot be mocked. What he needs is courage, honesty and genuine repentance in order to publicly ask for forgiveness from those he has wronged, since this is the only way to vindicate himself and his congregation, and, by so doing, compensate his victims in some slight way.

Seek the truth yourself, Father Oriol, as you advise others to do, for it is truth that will make you free and happy, as you have said. Stop being part of the Works of Darkness, believing, perhaps in good faith, that you are a bearer of truth and light.

“But if anyone causes the downfall of one of these little ones who believe in me, it would be better for him to have a millstone hung around his neck and be drowned in the depths of the sea. � —Matthew 18, 6.

Please feel free to contact me regarding any clarification.

Francisco González P.

Former priest of the Legionaries of Christ

Zapopan, Jalisco (Mexico)

[Phone number withheld by REGAIN editor]

(Translation by REGAIN staff)

###

ITINERARIO LEGIONARIO DE 19 ANYOS DE FRANCISCO GONZALEZ PARGA:

CARRERA EN LA LEGION: Desde julio del ’51, A LOS ONCE ANYOS, hasta Diciembre del ’70

1-APOSTÓLICA:
Tlalpam, MEXICO: Julio 1951 a Julio 1954
Ontaneda, SPAIN: Julio 1954 a julio 1955:

2-POSTULANTADO: Vacaciones de Verano del 1955:

3-NOVICIADO: Septiembre del ’55, a Septiembre del ’57;

4-PREFECTO DE POSTULANTES: Verano del ’57: Grupo del P. Mariano de Blas; P. Blásquez; Bonifacio Padilla; Raúl de Anda,…

5-JUNIORADO: Septiembre 57 a Septiembre del ’59

6- E S T U D I O S
S U P E R I O R E S: R O M E
-FILOSOFIA: Septiembre del ’59 a Septiembre del 62;
-TEOLOGÃ�A: Licenciatura: Septiembre del ’62 a Septiembre del 65.
Simultáneamente Asistente del Maestro de Novicios en Irlanda del 62 al 65; alternando los meses de trabajo en el Noviciado, con los meses de Estudio en Roma.
-DOCTORADO EN TEOLOGÃ�A: Septiembre del 65 a Septiembre del ’68.
-El 7 de Julio del ’66, me ordené de sacerdote y entre al Vaticano, a formar parte de la Sagrada Congregación para las Obispos como escritor de 3er. nivel, hasta junio de 1969.
Simultáneamente a mis estudios de doctorado y trabajo en el Vaticano, desempeñé el cargo de Prefecto de Estudios de los seminaristas legionarios: en el año 1965-66, fuí prefecto de estudios de Filosofía; y del año 1966 al 69, fui prefecto de estudios de Teología;

7-DESTIERRO [EXILE] EN IRLANDA: Julio ’69 a Diciembre del ’70;

8- SALIDA [ESCAPE]: Me escapé del colegio de Roma en un taxi el 29 de Diciembre de 1970.

###

VERSION ORIGINAL

[The following is the original Spanish version of the letter written by Francisco Gonzalez-Parga to a newspaper in Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico]

MACIEL, ¿VERDAD O MENTIRA?

Al Padre Juan Pedro Oriol, LC., y
Sres. Jorge Suárez Huizar y Arturo Lucke Gracián.

Leí su crítica de la película “El Código Da Vinci�. Estoy de acuerdo en todo, sin embargo me llamó mucho la atención su comentario del Padre Marcial Maciel al que Ud. se refiere diciendo que es “Hombre bueno, íntegro y fiel�. Por otro lado Ud. sugiere a sus lectores que “no dejen de descubrir la verdad, porque solo la verdad nos hace libres y felices�.

Con ese espíritu de amor a la verdad que Ud. sugiere, quiero informarle que yo fui Sacerdote de los Legionarios de Cristo. Durante los 20 años de trabajo y estudio en que permanecí en la Legión, obtuve Licenciatura en Filosofía y Doctorado en Teología por la Universidad Gregoriana y fui Prefecto de Estudios en el Colegio Máximo de los Legionarios de Cristo, en Roma.

Ahora bien, con el ánimo de ayudarle a Ud. también a encontrar la verdad, quiero que sepa que fui victima a corta edad de abusos sexuales directos, perpetrados con engaños premeditados por el Padre Maciel. Por esa causa y a pesar que fui ordenado Sacerdote en Roma por el entonces Papa Pablo VI, [Editor: Fui ordenado sacerdote en Julio de 1966 por el Papa Paulo VI, en la Basílica de San Pedro en Roma, del Testimonio del autor], me vi impulsado a abandonar la Legión y el Sacerdocio, llevando conmigo todo el daño moral y psicológico que usted se puede imaginar y que sufrí por muchos años al grado de vivir enfermo, con peligro de perder la vida y con depresiones continuas, como consecuencia del abuso cometido contra mi persona por el Padre Maciel y aún en la actualidad sufro las consecuencias.
Pero ese es sólo mi caso, ¿qué hay de los otros cien (100) o más casos reportados bajo juramento por escrito a la Santa Sede? Yo perdoné ya al P. Maciel, y espero que Dios lo ilumine y lo ayude a reconocer su grave pecado cometido contra quienes han sido sus víctimas y sus familias, contra la sociedad y contra los mismos Legionarios de Cristo que de buena fe permanecen en la Congregación.

Y si me dirijo a Ud. públicamente es porque me da en cara tanto engaño, falsedad y mentira y me duele que haya tantas personas que renuncian a conocer la verdad, y otras aún, que “detienen con injusticia la verdad�. Porque se necesita no querer “buscar� la verdad, o incluso no querer “verla� por algún interés creado, para no darse cuenta que si el Papa Benedicto XVI se vio obligado, por razones de conciencia, a tomar una medida drástica contra el P. Maciel y a retirarlo de toda práctica pública del ministerio sacerdotal, es porque constató suficiente evidencia para hacerlo, a pesar de la deshonra a la que exponía con ese acto a la Iglesia Católica, a la persona del Papa Juan Pablo II y a su misma persona, y a pesar del daño que podía causar, tanto a la credibilidad de la congregación de los Legionarios de Cristo y del Movimiento Regnum Christi, como a las ventajas económicas, políticas y sociales que estas instituciones le aportan al Vaticano y a la Santa Sede.
Es de la opinión de mucha gente pensante que el leve castigo otorgado por el Papa al Padre Maciel, se debe al conflicto de intereses, dadas las ventajas mencionadas que representan los Legionarios de Cristo para el Vaticano y para el Papado. Por eso en vez de juzgarlo por los atroces crímenes de homosexualidad y abuso de poder cometidos contra tantos jóvenes candidatos al sacerdocio, simplemente lo escondieron de la vista pública para que viva cómodamente en la opulencia y atendido por servidores incondicionales dentro de la Legión, aunque con la recomendación por parte del Papa para que aproveche su tiempo para orar y hacer penitencia. Lo va a necesitar, porque Dios no puede ser burlado y se necesita valentía, honestidad y un genuino arrepentimiento para pedir perdón públicamente a las personas que ofendió pues es lo único que podría reivindicar al Padre Maciel y a la congregación y así resarcir de alguna manera a sus víctimas.

Busque Ud. la Verdad, Padre, de acuerdo a lo que aconseja, ya que la Verdad lo hará verdaderamente libre y feliz como usted dice. No siga participando en las obras de las tinieblas, pensando quizá de buena fe que es portador de luz y de verdad.
“Y cualquiera que haga tropezar a alguno de estos pequeños que creen en mí, mejor le fuera, que se le atase una piedra de molino al cuello y que se le arrojase en lo profundo del mar� (Mateo 18, 6).

Estoy a sus órdenes para cualquier aclaración.

Francisco González P.

Ex Sacerdote de los Legionarios de Cristo

Zapopan, Jal.

[Número telefónico no revelado por REGAIN]

Fr. Maciel’s Defenders Of The Faith

LC/RC SUPERIORS’ & SUPORTERS’ Response to Vatican communique regarding the Founder

 

By The Authors, texts compiled by ReGAIN Staff

 

Texts of Official Legion Response,
Letters of LC/RC Superiors Corcuera and Sada
COMPASS Message
Introvigne
Neuhaus
Final analysis from ETWN regarding LC/RC Response

 

COMMUNIQUE FROM THE CONGREGATION OF THE LEGIONARIES OF CHRIST
Click here for external link

The Legion of Christ and the Regnum Christi Movement in response to the communique of the Holy See renew their commitment to serve the Church

In reference to the news regarding the conclusion of the investigation of the accusations made against Father Marcial Maciel, our beloved father founder, the Congregation of the Legionaries of Christ offers the following statement:

1. Father Marcial Maciel has received during his life a great number of accusations. In the last few years, some of these were presented to the Holy See so that a canonical process would be opened.

2. Facing the accusations made against him, he declared his innocence and, following the example of Jesus Christ, decided not to defend himself in any way.

3. Considering his advanced age and his frail health, the Holy See has decided to forgo a canonical hearing and to invite him to a reserved life of penitence and prayer, relinquishing any form of public ministry.

4. Father Maciel, with the spirit of obedience to the Church that has always characterized him, has accepted this communique with faith, complete serenity and tranquility of conscience, knowing that it is a new cross that God, the Father of Mercy, has allowed him to suffer and that will obtain many graces for the Legion of Christ and the Regnum Christi Movement.

5. The Legionaries of Christ and the members of Regnum Christi, following the example of Father Maciel and united to him, accept and will always accept the directives of the Holy See with profound spirit of obedience and faith. We renew our commitment to work with great intensity to live our charism of charity and extend the Kingdom of Christ serving the Church.

———–
LETTER FROM FR. ALVARO CORCUERA, SUPERIOR GENERAL OF THE LEGION OF CHRIST

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE REGNUM CHRISTI MOVEMENT

5/25/2006

Click here for external link

Rome, May 25, 2006

To the members of the
Regnum Christi Movement
My Dear Friends in Christ,

I wish to send you a special greeting and congratulations today, which is the 58th anniversary of the Canonical Approval of the Legion, a celebration that recalls one of the most important moments in our history.

I had the great pleasure this morning of being the main concelebrant at a Mass said at the Gregorian Altar in St Peter’s Basilica, in the Vatican, at the feet of Our Lady of Perpetual Help. Over 500 Legionaries participated in the Mass, and some 100 Legionary priests concelebrated.

I was remembering that precisely there, before this picture of our Heavenly Mother, 58 years ago Nuestro Padre received consolation and strength from her in a time of great suffering. You know from our history the grace that followed from there, the Canonical Approval of the Legion of Christ.

Mary, our loving Mother in Heaven, is with us always. Without a doubt, today more than ever she is with us. At her feet this morning I offered the Holy Mass for the many intentions we all bear in our hearts. First of all I prayed for our beloved Pope, Benedict XVI and for the fruit of the apostolic journey to Poland that he set out on precisely today. I prayed to God our Lord that the Pope will always experience the consolation of the support, adhesion and love of all faithful Catholics. Therefore, before the image of Mary, in the name of all Legionaries and of all of you, members of Regnum Christi, I renewed our commitment to love the Pope personally, as our Founder has always taught us both by word and example.

I also prayed, of course, for our Father Founder, that he will continue to experience Mary’s motherly consolation, and the filial adhesion and closeness of all of us. We are forever his sons and daughters in Christ and in the Church.

And I prayed for all the Legionaries and members of Regnum Christi, that with the love Christ kindles in our hearts we will continue to try to live the charism of charity which unites us in a single heart and a single mind, and that we will bring the fire of this love to every corner of the earth, fulfilling the mission Christ has given us.

This charity is our distinctive characteristic; when all is said and done it is what gives meaning to our life, no matter what happens. For we want to be authentic Christians. Because Christ has made it so that love is the motor and center of our life.

How beautiful and how fruitful is the mystery of love! Not the abstract notion of love, but love become life, love become gift, love become commitment. This is the love that springs from the experience of Love: Deus caritas est! And Christ’s love impels us? to love everyone, as Christ taught us in word and action, up to the very death on a cross. He said,If you love those who love you, what merit is there in that? And St Paul left us the great lesson, without love, I am no more than a gong booming or a cymbal clashing.? (1 Cor 13,1).

My dear Regnum Christi members, if trials cause us to love more, blessed be the times of trouble, darkness and pain! When the pain is greater, love more. When the difficulties are greater, be more humble and live in greater holiness. I remember some notes that Nuestro Padre sent us when we were starting out in the Movement. In one of them he said, love everyone in Christ, without exception, as Christ loves each one of us.?

The first Christians changed the world, not through their many or few qualities, their greater or lesser intelligence, their greater or lesser knowledge. They changed it because they loved, and they brought love to its ultimate consequences. It is our turn today to make love’s rainbow shine, before the needs of so many people who suffer. What a blessing from God it would be to take advantage of every moment to love and to do good! Christ’s love burning in our hearts will change the world. If you love you give only love. Here is our true apostolate.

In this morning’s Mass I also prayed and asked our Lord to allow us to face our pain and difficulties humbly and even gratefully. They are part of the life of every Christian, and they have always characterized the Legion and the Regnum Christi Movement. Tribulation is a sign of God’s infinite love for us. As St Paul says, “All things work for good for those who love God”? (Rom 8,28). He never allows anything that is not for our benefit.

I believe that God wants us to be firmer now in our apostolic commitment, and to take advantage of this time to make our dedication purer and less self-seeking, and our faith firmer and deeper. This is a magnificent opportunity to imitate Christ who went about doing good? (Acts 10, 38), always, his whole life long, to whomever he met on his way. It is not enough to do good when everything turns out as we would have wished, and people praise and acclaim us. Do good, always, not only sporadically or when circumstances are favorable. In times of pain and loneliness, in times of joy and peace. Never tiring of doing good! This is what God created us for. For this we were born and for this we were redeemed. May God make us spreaders of good, speaking always well of others, building the good name of our neighbor, fighting to always think well of others. May this turn us into true followers of Christ. Our human and Christian calling is to love, and we know that love passes through the cross.

At different times during Mass this morning we sang hymns that filled the naves of St Peter’s. And I thought to myself that this is what we should be in the Church, a resonating symphony, beautiful and harmonious because of each one’s holiness of life, our cordial and affectionate closeness to the Pope, our fidelity to the charism that God has given us to serve the Church. Each according to his role in the body of the Church. With our qualities and also with our defects and limitations, but always seeking sincerely the harmony that will allow us to hear in our hearts the infinite beauty of God’s love.

How different would the world be if instead of dwelling on our differences we spent our lives complementing each other! As one body. One Lord, one Faith, one Baptism, one God and Father of all, who is over all, through all and in all? (Eph 4, 5-6).

In a few days time on the Vigil of Pentecost, we will have here in Rome the encounter of all the Movements with the Pope. Many of you are set to be present. I hope many more can join us at this event and thus renew to the Holy Father our adhesion in faith, and our filial love. Let us give him the joy of seeing that now our love for the Church is deeper and more robust, that we burn with the same love for the Church that moves Nuestro Padre’s heart, a love that perceives the heartbeats of our Mother, that meditates on her in faith, embraces her in obedience, spreads her in the apostolate, makes her holy in our lives.?

Let us pray more intensely in the coming days, Come Holy Spirit, fill the hearts of your children and pour into them the fire of your love.? What an understanding this gives us of Christ’s words, <q?i came=”” to=”” bring=”” fire=”” the=”” earth,=”” and=”” how=”” i=”” wish=”” it=”” were=”” already=”” blazing!=””>(Lk 12,49). It is the fire of love, and he wants us to be instruments of his love. Each one as a candle that is consumed so that Christ’s love and light will shine forth and enlighten. This anniversary coincided in the Vatican with the Solemnity of the Lord’s Ascension. The Acts of the Apostles tell us that Jesus before ascending to Heaven told his apostles, You will receive the power of the Holy Spirit which will come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, throughout Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth? (Acts 1.8). Christ today sends us too, to preach to the whole world the message of salvation. And he invites us to lift up our pilgrim eyes to see that our goal is heaven, and to hear the ever relevant words of St Paul, Rejoice always in the Lord? (Phil 4,4)

As you know, the Ordination to the Diaconate of 54 Legionaries of Christ is one of the events we have organized for the encounter with the Pope on the vigil of Pentecost. Please pray for them that they will continue to prepare themselves for their future configuration with Christ the Priest, and they will be willing to share in the mystery of the Cross, the only path that Christ chose to obtain the redemption of man.

Let us turn once again our eyes to Mary, our loving Mother who never abandons us. Let us listen to the words she spoke one day to St Juan Diego, Let nothing dismay you or cause you affliction. Am I not here, your mother?? What peace it gives us to know that we are always protected, watched over with care by the Blessed Virgin. We have received countless blessings at the feet of her image at the Tepeyac. And also at the feet of her image over the Gregorian Altar in St Peter’s Basilica. I am sure that now more than ever she continues to be close to us, she covers us with her cloak, and she will gain for us the grace to live this time with deep faith, infinite trust in God, and with the love of children who seek only to please him by accepting his Most Holy Will as she did.

With my sincere affection, and asking you also to remember me in your prayers,

I remain,
Your affectionate servant in Christ,
Alvaro Corcuera

(Translation of the original Spanish letter)

———–
FR. EVARISTO SADA, LC, SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE CONGREGATION OF THE LEGION OF CHRISTI TO ALL REGNUM CHRISTI SECTION LEADERS

[internally distributed to members]

Thy Kingdom Come!

Dearly beloved in Christ,

We have received the messages several of you have sent sharing your thoughts and feelings about all that has happened in recent days. The beauty of the spirit, which we have inherited from Nuestro Padre, can be perceived in these letters. In spite of the pain we are experiencing, what prevails is the feeling of faith, of love for the Pope and the Church, for obedience, and also of course for the greatest unity and charity towards Nuestro Padre, whom we are accompanying with our prayers and with our filial affection.

I had the opportunity to speak with him specifically about this by telephone a short while ago. I sent him your greetings as well as the allegiance and prayers of all of you, and he asked me to send you his deep gratitude. He asked me to assure you that he is including the legionaries and the members of the Movement in his prayers and in the celebration of the Holy Mass, which he now conducts privately — for, as you know, that has been the invitation which the Holy See has extended.

For my part I have reaffirmed the following in my prayers:

* Above all let us accept with humility and supernatural obedience the dispositions of the Holy See;

* Now more than ever let us learn to maintain the most beautiful gift of internal unity: united in prayer, united by charity, united by our exquisite fidelity to the charism of Regnum Christi; may the good spirit which has always characterized our sections continue to reign;

* Let us not be surprised: let us remember that the history of the Church is filled with such vicissitudes — including the most serious — as was the case of Fr. John Bosco, of Blessed Rafael Guizar Valencia, of Nuestro Padre and of other saints in the history of the Church; but just as they
learned to obey only to be rewarded later by God, so we are sure that God will achieve a greater good from this moment of grace.

In summary, since we have always professed and promoted love and cordial allegiance to the Pope, let us do so now more than ever. We have always encouraged respect for the person and for the authority of the Holy Father among our own and among all other people. We cannot now allow criticism of the Pope to take place. That would be the worst thing that could happen.

I invite you to share these considerations with other members of your section.

You can count on my prayers.

Affectionately yours in Christ,

Evaristo Sada, L.C.

—-

COMPASS COMMUNIQUE

From Veronica Wilkins

Dear COMPASS students in Christ,

You may have heard some of the information circulating around the media in the last couple days about the founder of the Legion and the Regnum Christi Movement, Fr. Marcial Maciel, LC. Some of this information may have confused you or caused you to ask questions, so I wanted to write and share a little of my experience with Fr. Maciel, the Legion and the Movement, and some reflections that Ive had on the statement from the Holy See.

I met the Movement, Legion and Fr. Maciel on the 2002 COMPASS Fellowship, where during a conference with Fr. Maciel, I was struck by his holiness, zeal and relationship with Christ. As he told us the story of his boyhood friend, Blessed Jose Luis Sanchez del Rio, who was martyred at fourteen during the Cristero War in Mexico, I could not help but desire to be closer to this Jesus who was worth dying for. Particularly during that summer, as my faith was taking shape, I would again and again return to that conference with the thoughts I can believe because he believes. I know that my faith is real because I have seen it lived radically and joyfully. I have seen what I want to be at the end of my life. I joined Regnum Christi about a year later with a desire to continue growing in my relationship with Christ.

Now after having graduated from university, I am in my second year volunteering with COMPASS through the Regnum Christi Movement. I can assure you that the more that I read about and from Fr. Maciel, and the more that I embrace its spirituality, the closer I grow in my relationship with Christ.
I am constantly in contact with the consecrated women and Legionaries, and have been treated only with charity. The depth of Fr. Maciel’s relationship with Christ can be seen most evidently in his numerous letters. Many of them can be found online at http://www.regnumchristi.org. So why if Fr. Maciel is so holy, does he suffer these accusations? You could also ask: why did Christ choose to redeem the world on the cross?

Gods ways are mysterious, and he chooses suffering for those he loves best; he purifies those who he wants to bring to perfection. The history of the Church is filled with founders and saints who suffered ignominy and persecution during their lives, only to be vindicated after their death (look at the lives of Padre Pio and Jeanne Jugan, for example). You could also ask, why doesn’t he defend himself? Which again leads to the question:

why did Christ not respond to his accusers when they demanded that he defend himself in his trial in front of the Pharisees? The response of Christ is the response that Fr. Maciel has chosen humble submission to the will of God. It may not make sense to our human intellect, but it fulfills Gods plan for Fr. Maciel, the Legion, and the Movement, and gives us all an example of what living heroic charity really means putting others before yourself, even at the risk of defamation.

I am also copying onto the bottom of this email the official communique from the Holy See about their decision and the response of the Legion of Christ and the Movement. Please also check

http://www.regnumchristi.org or http://www.legionofchrist.org for more information.

Sincerely in Christ,

Veronica Wilkins

Event Coordinator
COMPASS Office
401-480-6571

RESPONSE from xRC Regain member

Sometimes people are defamed for the sake of purification, and sometimes because sad truths come to light. Cardinal Law has been accused of negligence, and no one suggested it was purification of the elect. Father Shanley was accused of pedophilia, and he was not beatified as a martyr, he was sent to jail. It is also important to note that no one called him heroic for accepting his sentence and going to jail — that’s not heroic obedience. Father Maciel cannot be called ‘obedient’ for simply accepting the Vatican’s censure — it’s mandatory.

Veronica now has to find Christ without Maciel, and I am sure she will be just as holy, maybe holier.

————–
Massimo Introvigne, CESNUR & National Catholic Register, LC. The Holy See and the Legionaries of Christ: Facts and Fiction
Click here for external link

Fr. Richard John Neuhaus, First Things [& Vatican I]
Click here for external link

—————

ETWN ANALYZES LEGION DEFENSE
Click here for external link

Full text below:

VATICAN DISCIPLINES FOUNDER OF LEGIONARIES OF CHRIST

Other news making waves in Rome and around the world, was the announcement on May 19 by the Vatican, in a statement it released on investigations into allegations that the founder of the Legionaries of Christ sexually abused seminarians decades ago, that it has banned Fr. Marcial Maciel from any form of public ministry. The decisions in his regard were approved by the Pope. Accusations against Maciel began to arrive at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1998, though some had been publicly made before. The statement said the accusations are for crimes that fall under the exclusive competence of this congregation.?

In 2002, said the statement, Fr. Maciel issued a denial of the accusations, expressing his displeasure at the offense done him by certain former Legionaries of Christ. In 2005, by reason of his advanced age, Fr. Maciel retired from the office of superior general of the Legionaries.? Fr. Maciel is 86. After having attentively studied the results of the investigation, it was decided, said the May 19 statement, that bearing in mind Fr. Maciel’s advanced age and his delicate health, to forgo a canonical hearing and to invite the father to a reserved life of penitence and prayer, relinquishing any form of public ministry.

Following is the full Vatican statement, translated from the Italian by the Vatican Information Service (VIS):

Beginning in 1998, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith received accusations, already partly made public, against Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado, founder of the Congregation of the Legionaries of Christ, for crimes that fall under the exclusive competence of the congregation. In 2002, Fr. Maciel published a declaration denying the accusations and expressing his displeasure at the offense done him by certain former Legionaries of Christ. In 2005, by reason of his advanced age, Fr. Maciel retired from the office of superior general of the Congregation of the Legionaries of Christ.

All these elements have been subject to a mature examination by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and – in accordance with the Motu Proprio ‘Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela,’ promulgated on April 30 2001 by Servant of God John Paul II – the then prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, authorized an investigation into the accusations. In the meantime, Pope John II died and Cardinal Ratzinger was elected as the new Pontiff. After having attentively studied the results of the investigation, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, under the guidance of the new prefect, Cardinal William Joseph Levada, decided – bearing in mind Fr. Maciel’s advanced age and his delicate health – to forgo a canonical hearing and to invite the father to a reserved life of penitence and prayer, relinquishing any form of public ministry. The Holy Father approved these decisions.

Independently of the person of the Founder, the worthy apostolate of the Legionaries of Christ and of the Association ‘Regnum Christi’ is gratefully recognized.

The Legionaries answered the statement in lightning fashion with a press release on what is now called a temporary web site. The speed with which they released their statements indicated it had been prepared well in advance, perhaps expecting this news, even though just days earlier they had issued denials about any such forthcoming statement by the Vatican.

Following is that complete statement which was released in English, Spanish, French, German, Italian and Portuguese:

In reference to the news regarding the conclusion of the investigation of the accusations made against Father Marcial Maciel, our beloved father founder, the Congregation of the Legionaries of Christ offers the following statement:

1. Father Marcial Maciel has received during his life a great number of accusations. In the last few years, some of these were presented to the Holy See so that a canonical process would be opened.

2. Facing the accusations made against him, he declared his innocence and, following the example of Jesus Christ, decided not to defend himself in any way.

3. Considering his advanced age and his frail health, the Holy See has decided not to begin a canonical process but to invite him to a reserved life of prayer and penance, renouncing all public ministry.?

4. Father Maciel, with the spirit of obedience to the Church that has always characterized him, he has accepted this communique with faith, complete serenity and tranquility of conscience, knowing that it is a new cross that God, the Father of Mercy, has allowed him to suffer and that will obtain many graces for the Legion of Christ and the Regnum Christi Movement.

5. The Legionaries of Christ and the members of the Regnum Christi, following the example of Father Maciel and united to him, accept and will accept always the directives of the Holy See with profound spirit of obedience and faith. We renew our commitment to work with great intensity to live our charism of charity and extend the Kingdom of Christ serving the Church.?

ZENIT, a Rome-based news organization of the Legionaries of Christ, published its own translation of the May 19 Vatican document. One change was noticed immediately in the first paragraph. Where the word Italian delitti? in the Vatican statement was translated by VIS (and others whose translations appeared on the Internet) as crimes,? it was translated by ZENIT as offenses.? Was this a willed change, an inadvertent one and does it even have any significance, were some of the questions asked by those who noticed the difference in translation.

There may never be an answer but to set the record straight: The correct term for delittoin canon law and similar Church documents would be delict.?

For example, from the Vatican Norms Governing Grave Offenses, Including Sexual Abuse of Minors, we have: Article 4 AS 1. Reservation to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is also extended to a delict against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue committed by a cleric with a minor below the age of eighteen years. AS 2. One who has perpetrated the delict mentioned in AS 1 is to be punished according to the gravity of the offense, not excluding dismissal or deposition.?

Or, from the U.S Bishops Dallas Charter: In accord with Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela (SST), article 4 AS1, sexual abuse, for purposes of this Charter, shall include any offense by a cleric against the Sixth Commandment of the Decalogue with a minor as understood in the Code of Canon Law, c. 1395 AS2 (A cleric who in another way has committed an offense against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue, if the delict was committed by force or threats or publicly or with a minor below the age of sixteen years [raised in SST to eighteen years which has been the age of majority for the USA since 1994], is to be punished with just penalties, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state if the case so warrants).

More important than the translation of one word, however, is what does this mean for the Legionaries of Christ, whose own lives are wrapped up in and often identified with the very life and person of their founder? Much as it is for members of Opus Dei, founded in Spain, Spanish is the official? language of the LC because it is the language of their founder and they are expected to read all of his writings in the original language.

Reactions to the May 19 statement and the open and public discipline of Fr. Maciel have ranged from joy on the part of those working to stop all sexual abuse by priests to the imaginable devastation of Legionaries and their numerous loyal supporters and benefactors, many of whom insist the charges are trumped up and cannot possibly be true.

One priest, though not a huge fan of the LC, echoed several others when he told me the accusations are absurd. If you look at most of the accusers, they are former seminarians or ex-priests and this type of person can be vicious when it comes to their former ‘family’. The Vatican statement does not even specifically accuse Fr. Maciel of anything.

Most people with whom I spoke feel this is a serious blow to the Legionaries, founded in 1941 by Fr. Maciel and considered a very orthodox, conservative order. The LC, is one of the fastest growing orders in the world: there are currently close to 700 priests worldwide and over 2,500 seminarians, many of whom study in Rome’s Regina Apostolorum seminary and university. An affiliated lay movement is called Regnum Christi.

One priest defined the Vatican action as a definite blow to the Legionaries, but a courageous act on the Pope’s part based entirely, I believe, on his principle of justice.Indeed. The Legionaries do great work, especially in the field of education and, with special programs in Rome, in the area of bioethics. They are seen as young, zealous, dynamic, loyal solders of Christ. And their followers are, shall we shall, legion.

The bottom line is that the coming weeks and months, perhaps even years, will undoubtedly be a period of great self-examination, of introspection and prayer by the Legionaries, that could lead to a re-birth of their charism.
——————-

ORTHODOX CATHOLIC TAKES BREAK FROM THE FRAY

U2U received on 06/16/06

“ReGAIN,

I have concluded that I need to take a break from this topic for a while. I am happy that the Vatican took a small step in the right direction.

I hope they subject the LC to an apostolic visitation and clean it out. I won’t hold my breath for that to happen.

The coverup of well substantiated sexual abuse is endemic to the Catholic Church. It is standard operating procedure. The only thing that is forcing a change is the massive civil suits.

The article I sent on Ratzinger/ Benedict clamping down on mystics, private revelations etc. is important. Some people have made such outragious claims even for Maciel. No wonder St. John of the Cross warned adamantly against chasing after such occurances.

I think the LC is probably filled with victims of MM some of whom may be abusers themselves. I dread the thought of preteens and teenagers studying with them.

I think that ultra orthodox American Catholics want to believe that a group like the Legion is somehow magically above the ordinary human condition due to its supposed adherence to the magisterium. That’s why they can criticize Cardinal Law on one hand then not even consider the possibility that Cardinals could mishandle the MM case.

I need a break. I’m glad that there has been a Church recognition of MM’s guilt ambiguous as it may be. I believe John Allen’s sources who said the evidence is overwhelming.

In writing about the Vatican statement I suggest you often repeat Neuhaus’s statement that it is reasonable to conclude that the Vatican believes he did something wrong. This is important because the other side only listens to arguments from conservative authority.

If you don’t hear from me for awhile, know that I am alive and very well but need a break from the stench and the stupidy.

Translate »
%%footer%%