Jose Barba Martin – The Reasons for My Silence

By Jose Barba Martín
The author is presently a full professor, advisor and researcher at Mexico City’s ITAM, (Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México) in the field of the History of Ideas and the Humanities.

 

We have been solely interested in tracing particular ideas to their source. As there can be no thoughts without a thinker, thinking means a person-thinking. The form of thought, the sort of explanation, suggestion or hypothesis that comes to mind, the amount of effort exerted are characteristic of the thinker as an individual with a distinctive life history, and every one of his thoughts must be understood in the context of his personal past.

(John Cohen, Humanistic Psychology).

 

Dear Eduardo:

Recent discussions in which I was involved in the Mexican media regarding sexual abuse by a prominent Mexican priest inevitably begged the question: in such serious matters why had my companions and I waited until now to speak up after so many years of silence? This led you, kind magazine editor, to suggest I craft a response. Your personal and gentle request prompted me to write in the form of a letter that would let my memory play with the concept of silence. Reminiscing would bring back an intimate yet distant spectrum of silences. As I reflected I would realize how that particular form of freedom had vanished from my once happy life. Silence would no longer be a joyful experience for me due to a pseudo-religious experience of my youth that took my Christianity hostage for many years. Silence, once corrupted, turned oppressive.

 

FASCINATION WITH SILENCE AND FIRST YEARS WITH THE LEGION IN SPAIN

Though Mexican by birth, my adolescence, spent in Europe a few years after the end of World War II, and my early youth, were ruled, ethically, by the concept of Human Will and marked by several experiences of Silence. Even as a child I was fascinated by silence, like an intuition that led me into the essence of things: their stillness, immobility, and otherness. In my social and moral life I would always associate silence with its opposite, the word, and also with the feeling of freely chosen solitude. That is why, when my speech, my personal thoughts and the pursuit of company and friendship were taken away, for me silence became associated with force and imposition.

I believe that my early upbringing in a deeply religious home laid the groundwork for a love and admiration of silence. From the beginning of my religious instruction and practice I was always struck by the grandiose silence of God hovering over the obscure lifeless waters. Later, as a Humanities student, I was impressed by the many silences of Christ that I read about in writers such as De la Palma, Ricciotti, Hornaert, Papini, Daniel Rops and even in Gabriel Mira’s sensual Figures of the Passion. In my first encounters with Spanish poetry, inherited from the creative teaching of Luis Alonso Schokel at the University of Comillas in Spain, I empathized with Enrique Gonzalez Martinez and the pure lyricism of his Silenter, simultaneously ethical and aesthetic. I listened to the poet Antonio Machado’s somber fountains which increased the quiet of luminous still evenings::only the fountain could be heard…: My soul became enraptured with the perfumed rhythm of Juan Ramon Jiménez’s Nocturnes: The night was immortal, serene, transparent… the trees are still, their quietness is so human they seem more alive now than when they move their branches…

Those wonderful days were also lively, full of walks and mountain climbing, while at the same time, moderated by the constant presence of an imposing gray-green sea. Like an ancient and sober mythical tutor the sea taught us depth, reflection and prudence. Ours was innocent adolescence, still free from deceit; ours too a spirituality without complications, a Christianity without sects or divisions. I was not aware at that time that I would be part of the Church’s Special Forces. We had not yet been introduced to our future German companions, several of them members of Hitler Youth during the last years of the war: Joseph Hermann Schmidt Valkenberg (Solingen), Walter Lamertz (Dusseldorf), Hans Georg Beyler (Duisburg). Soon they would be introduced, with obvious pro-Nazi admiration, as examples of Aryan strength, in contrast to our Mexican softness.

The quiet and harmonious monastic life of the Cistercians left its mark on us during our stay at the Colegio Mayor Mexicano in Cóbreces, Santander, just a few miles from the Jesuit University of Comillas where Marcial Maciel’s follower studied during the first years in Spain. We were also close to the Cabuarniga Woods, at that time still inhabited by wild boar and wolves as described by Pereda in his novel Peñas Arriba. Nearby, the bells of the Cistercian Abbey of Santa Mara de Via Caeli -white and gentle as a lamb- tolled across the rolling green valley… The mysterious wordless walk of the Cistercians fascinated us and our minds and hearts fell in love with things medieval and chivalrous: Mount Saint Michel, Chartres, Bernard of Clairvaux who left his arms to become a spiritual troubadour. All these imaginings were reinforced by the presence of Father Fructuoso, the monastery bursar, who often came to our aid with food when the dollars changed on the black market or by Don Martin at the railway cafe in Santander were not enough to see us through. I remember this priest fondly because he was the one who authorized the Spanish translation of Thomas Merton’s The Seven Storey Mountain, which would later lead me to The Sign of Jonah and Seeds of Contemplation .

This idyllic period is full of still more pleasant memories: red sunsets on the cliffs over the Bay of Biscay; listening to Beethoven’s Sixth Symphony under the apple trees across the road from the college; reading Horace at the beginning of Spring, or savoring Virgil at the gradual lengthening of shadows as the orange sun slipped silently into the piggy bank hill beyond Vega de Pas…

 

THE PATH TO ROME

One day, towards the end of September, we were headed for the Pyrenees on our way to Italy, through a France that despite its defeat in Indochina– smacked of light clothing, relative wealth and freedom. It was paradoxical, I reflected, that as I left the world bound for religious austerity, life seemed to open up to me so brightly with fields of sunshine, shaded roads -as straight as the Ways of the Lord- along the blessed land of Provence redolent of harvest and wine press. Vineyards, orange groves and olive trees mixed with my memories of Caesar’s Gallic Wars. Reddish Liguria received us with Italian Reconstruction. Quickly Genoa, Pisa, Leghorn -with its large American military presence- sped by; then we left Grosseto behind in our hurry to get to Rome, a triumphant, open city more than ever in the early 1950s. The Ancient Via Aurelia we had taken from France came to an end. This early October evening was clear, warm, contemplative. Everything I had learned so enthusiastically about Imperial and Christian Rome came together as in a dream at the sight of St. Peter’s dome shining in the distance. This is what I had been seeking: Rome, art, virtue and holiness. One afternoon shortly after, in the glorious solitude of the Roman countryside, I would be struck dumb by the beauty of it all.

Vertical glass panes of silence? A few days after arriving in Rome at the college of the Legion of Christ, and as the long- awaited religious experience seemed right at hand, the time for letting go suddenly arrived. I was given my knights arms by the superior. These consisted of a Latin prayer book called Manuale Christianum, a spiked metal band to tie around my right thigh on Mondays mornings, and a small knotted cord whip to scourge my back on Wednesday nights. During the daytime the spotless Travertine corridors of the modern Collegio Massimo coldly reflected the purposely restrained slow pace of vigorous young men. Doorknobs shone brilliantly, thanks to our strenuous efforts with Brasso. No fly stains could be seen on the spotless windowpanes that separated us now from the former free blue sky silhouetted by beautiful Roman pines. In the austere chapel a pale white Cross adorning the back wall focused our gazes, while in the conference room Warner Salmann’s painting of Christ presided over our activities from above a shiny black concert piano.

As we began our Novitiate the cordial and friendly Spanish  from our carefree times of camaraderie was suppressed. In its place stood the contradictory formal and distant Spanish Usted (Your Honor) during recreation, and the Latin Carissime frater (Most Dear Brother) during relative silence, i.e. other times we were allowed to speak the minimum necessary. Though our humanistic studies had familiarized us with the glorious concepts of Cicero’s De Amicitia [On Friendship] from now on any personal friendship was strictly prohibited. Was this a peculiarity of religious life in general? We would later learn it was not. We were not allowed to contact students from other colleges, especially from the Colegio Español [Spain] or from the Pio Latino [Latin America]. These seminarians we were told- were lacking in the social graces typical of a Legionary; nor did they have the style of Christ we were to put on. We Legionaries were supposed to be distinguished as princes and, at the same time, humble servants of all?. We were not as strictly prohibited from talking with students from the American or the Canadian Colleges; their buildings were modern like ours and the students projected a suitable image of modernity. Unfortunately, none of us could speak their language fluently. Though Latin was the lingua franca at the Gregorian University we attended together, not many spoke it well enough to hold a conversation.

 

ABUSE, SILENCE AND CONTROL

Less than a year after entering the Collegio Massimo in Rome, Father Maciel, the Superior General and Founder, sexually abused me without warning on two separate occasions. I have described the ordeal in detail in my notarized deposition. As I realized much later, if we had been less innocent and docile we might have understood the dark motive behind those rules of silence and isolation. If we had been psychologically resiliant we might have been able to tell the superiors of the other students about what was happening in our college and perhaps, in their turn, they could have alerted their superiors or Vatican authorities.

Canon Law does allow religious to choose their personal confessor, even a priest from outside the community. Nevertheless, we were repeatedly told, as a number of Mexican bishops have stated recently- that dirty linen should be washed at home. However, just to cover the letter of the law, we were all brought en masse to the church of Santa Andrea della Valle, not far from Chiesa Nuova, once a year for our confessions with an outside priest. Needless to say, there was little danger of leaks. All those extraordinary confessors were cloistered monks.

Nobody questioned the scrutiny by superiors of all incoming and outgoing mail. I know some companions who used codes to secretly transmit their true feelings. I, personally, once wrote a coded message in my own journal. A request for a copy of Canon Law would have been denied. Mention of Human Rights would have been totally out of place. Nothing was ours. Neither our own words, and with time, not even our own thoughts. One particular night in my Roman life my eye caught a book title in the Saint Paul Bookstore window: No man is an Island by Thomas Merton, with the verse of John Donne, which in the 60s would inspire a Joan Baez song. But we, despite the appearances of Christian brotherly love, culturally and socially isolated, torn from family and country, were really an archipelago of solitudes, each one consumed by his own silence.

Was God a source of consolation and support? There existed according to our training an indivisible union, almost hypostatic, between God and the Superior. Scripture tells us that “The Spirit blows wherever it wishes”, but in the Legion of Christ even the interior motions of the Holy Spirit are subject to the superiors’ suspicious scrutiny. I know the case of a Legionary whose English edition of Saint John of the Cross, a present from his father -a worthy poet in his own right- was taken from him. The spiritual director found it to be dangerous material. Mystics such as Teresa of Avila and Sebastian de Orozco were limited to our Spanish Literature classes. The occasional visiting speaker might cite Catherine of Sienna, Angela de Foligno, and Elizabeth Lesieur. Edith Stein, now a doctor of the church and already spotted in a Madrid philosophy magazine, would have been dismissed for being Jewish. Meister Eckhart, Jacob Boehme and Jean Tauler were totally unknown to us. The richess of Greek spirituality, except for a collection of sermons by St. John Chrysostom, did not exist in our world.

Our interior nutrition consisted in memorizing some of St. Paul’s Epistles, programmed reading of the most boring of Spanish spiritual writers, Padre Alonso Rodriguez’s The Exercise of Perfection and Christian Virtues, and the pious Dom Columba Marmion. Most of the recommended spiritual reading reinforced a high level of dependence on the superior: Father Colina’s The Worship of the Rule and The Worship of the Vows. Our Novice Master, Rafael Arumí went as far as to praise some obscure nun’s work called Twelve Degrees of Silence, one of which degrees consisted in the trembling of the sanctuary flame. Fulton J. Sheen’s books, Life is Worth Living and The World’s First Love, well reviewed but rather light fare, were read to us at the refectory during meals. And, paradoxically, in this self-proclaimed Christ-centered institute our principal food was The Letters of Nuestro Padre (Maciel), for the most part spiritually insubstantial and apocryphal.

 

THE WOLF POUNCES

On very few occasions during all the years I knew and lived under the same roof with him did I see Father Maciel in silent reflection. I never once saw him praying alone contemplatively in a sacred space. Rarely did he say Mass when I was in Rome.

“Don’t mention my illness either to Father (Rafael) Arumí or to Father (Antonio) Lagoa”, I remember him telling me, after shamelessly and harshly masturbating me for the first time. It was springtime and, not far away from the Infirmary -the principal theater of generalized and repeated individual torture- an almond tree was beginning to blossom against the cleanest blue sky. Later my companions and I would begin to fathom that sacrilegious contradiction: Feckless Dionysus wanted to hide his unbridled passion behind the perfect facade of Apollo’s rigidly ordered collective discipline. Why be truly virtuous when by pretending, in a world of appearances -everything as if and always in the most opportunistic juxtaposition- by using powerful mind-control techniques and a clever cover-up system, spectacular results become sufficient proof? Fr. Marcial Maciel well knows that “there is nowhere in the world a museum of evil actions”. Vladimir Jankalovitch, The Evil Conscience, would have so much to tell if we invited him in! But Fr. Maciel never dreamed we would dare to analyze his psyche with an independent mind and under the light of psychological theories like those of Henri Baruk.

From then on I, for my part, began to live the silence of the innocent and started letting myself slowly die as I anxiously awaited more silencing. That initial astutely mastered silence became the first of a series of imposed silences. It was able to happen with the connivance of others in the institution. Now, a long time later and psychologically recovered, I clearly grasp the dynamics at play. For more information about mind control see the articles by Dr. John Hochmann of the University of Southern California, and William W. Sargent’s old book, The Battle for the Mind. [Translator adds: (1988) Hassan’s Combating Mind Control (1994), Tobias-Lalich’s Captive Hearts Captive Minds (1996) M.T. Singer’s Cults in Our Midst].

I suffered the second assault by the same perpetrator on Holy Saturday 1955. It was in the evening of what was supposed to be Sacred Silence. God Himself and my confusion were my only witnesses. That is what I wrote in my notarized deposition. Though I know there are people who will never believe me. Those who doubt should comprehend that a man over sixty does not need this kind of hassle. I am at a life stage when, as Kazantzakis writes, ‘it is time to quietly pick up the pencils’. It is so disconcerting now to look back on how gratuitously and naturally the abuse occurred; to realize just how absurdly improper it was: to sexually abuse a seminarian on Holy Saturday Evening. He did not attend that luminous Easter midnight Vigil. He had received his shots two hours before from those who had scrambled to find him his fix. In the infirmary darkness, very late, he said to me: “That’s the sound of Gregorian Chant in the chapel. Go upstairs, put on your uniform and join the community.” He didn’t need to tell me to keep silence. It was understood. The following day, a glorious Resurrection Sunday, he celebrated Mass, with great devotion. And he raised the Host holding it tensely between his fingers and staring at it intently- more than his usual prolonged performance.

 

THE HIERARCHY’S SILENCE

Despite being victims of abuse, my companions and I, because of our repressed fears and our deep psychological dependence, remained in the Legion for some time. Even after leaving we not only kept silence for many years but on occasions even returned to work for the Legion. During this gray period after exiting, Father Maciel astutely used different people and methods to keep us ex-members separated from each other. He would ever-so-discretely whisper to one that so and so did not harbor good feelings towards the institution; thus suggesting we stay away from each other. Despite all this, some of us previous victims did later secretly mention our worries to prominent ecclesiastical dignitaries. We were always told to leave everything in God’s hands. Other well-intentioned counselors told us to submit the testimonies in sealed envelopes to be opened after the abuser’s passing. We refused to do this for two reasons: as victims we needed to empower ourselves by confronting the perpetrator and we also wanted to give him the chance to defend himself.

Churchmen, as Hans Kung wrote a long time ago in an editorial for the Spanish paper El Pais, always demand secrecy. This way they can control both speech and silence. In mid-November 1956, during our questioning in Rome in the Maciel investigation when we withheld the truth, we had to swear not to reveal anything to outsiders. It took us so long to find out that others had been abused and were silent because we all felt bound by that original oath. Each one had to come to terms with the oath, with his emotional and spiritual health, his life situation, his profession and stage of recovery from abuse. Each one of us employed different isolation strategies for years until finally, during the late 80s and early 90s, some of us started talking freely to each other. Our common efforts to redress the abuse culminated on February 13, 1998. That day we hand delivered an Open Letter to the Pope at the Apostolic Nunciature in Mexico City. Six months later on Monday, July 6, 1988, the Papal Nuncio, Justo Mullor Garci­a, personally took my call, which had been arranged by Dr. Arturo Jurado the previous Friday. As I spoke I became aware that our conversation was being taped at the other end, even though the Nuncio interrupted our conversation several times to admonish me not to tape the proceedings. At the end of our talk he reminded me that The Church has its own courts to deal with such matters and he ordered me not to say anything about our conversation to reporters. On Saturday October 17, the same year, when we delivered our petition to the former Holy Office in the presence of ecclesiastical judge Don Antonio Roqueñi, our canon lawyer Dr. Martha Wegan, and Father Gianfranco Girotti, undersecretary to Cardinal Josef Ratzinger, we were once again sworn to silence. We accepted it with the understanding that our complaint would be treated in good faith and following Canon Law guidelines. We did our part. Only when we saw how we were contrary to the spirit and the letter of the law– summarily dismissed by the Congregation for the Defense of the Faith did we decide to go public again. Thus on the morning of July 31st. 2000 Dr. Martha Wegan and I met with Father Girotti in person and openly told him we would not remain silent any longer. It seems to me the Vatican is so preoccupied with the purity of faith that it seems to neglect the purity of actions. Ratzinger himself, according to the brave revelation of Father Alberto Athié, told the bishop of Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz, Monsignor Carlos Talavera, that silence was necessary in the delicate case of Father Marcial Maciel. This fact has been reported several times in the Mexican media.

 

THE BURDEN OF SILENCE

We survivors also bear the weight of other silences: of the relatives who ignore us, of associates who have drifted away, friends who disappear, former companions who want nothing to do with us. The latter know perfectly well that we are telling the truth. They themselves were victims, even confidants; some were accessories and helped cover up; others have born false testimony against us accusing us of conspiracy. We feel for those who remain in the institution, some of whom grow old suffering from chronic depression and are in need of medication. These were the men who were supposed to combat Communism, Liberation Theology, New Age Philosophy, the champions of Bio-ethics and Human Ecology -whatever happens to be the Trojan Horse in vogue to win over the current Pope-. These confreres, despite their philosophical and theological studies, remain prisoners of other captive souls; their sadness is deathly. They have not been able to break the chains that bind their own enslaved conscience. When will the moment come for them to salvage their dignity with the exercise of their last act of free will?

Other silences cause indignation: the silence of those at the top, of those that have so much to lose. This includes the spasmodic silence of certain media people who are under the control of interests and powers, even when some good individuals want to inform the public objectively and bravely. The latter, such as Ciro Gomez Leyva of TV Channel 40 in Mexico City, Carmen Aristegui and Javier Solarzano of Televisa’s suppressed Círculo Rojo have suffered in their professional lives for having given us space and voice on their programs.

Wherever there is grave injustice a Dreyfus case will surface. Who will be our Emile Zola?

Another silence overwhelms us. How could we forget? The painful silence of the Pope [Tr.. John Paul II] who seems to suffer from that old diplomatic trick of ambivalence: saying two different things at the same time. For those of us who grew up in the traditional faith this is the most disheartening silence of all.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

FORGIVE AND FORGET
Forgiveness, a sister of silence, is a social form of voluntary forgetting. But an individual may not appropriate the right to grant total pardon, because this is a prerogative of Society. Society is founded on the Law which, in this case, has been violated in our individual persons. Remembering, for its part, depending on how it is exercised, can either empower or create problems. For this reason truthful testimonies are necessary cultural instruments and vital resources in the fight against injustice, against oblivion, and against future historical distortion. Yosuf Yerushalmi has written with great feeling and with profound knowledge on this topic. For my part I am writing in support of certain rights and duties of Society and, ultimately, in favor of the Church Herself, despite the malice and arrogance of some people within Her ranks whom Baruch Spinoza referred to long ago in his Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. In such a grave matter, if we remain forever silent, who would speak up later?

In order to write this letter, Eduardo, I went to the country. And I can now hear Alfred Brendel playing Franz Liszt’s God’s Blessing in Solitude at the end of the room. I harbor no doubts regarding God’s silence because I know that our timing is not His timing. At this moment I can’t help but remember with deep sadness our dear Juan Manuel Fernandez Amenabar.

Like my noble and generous companions, I have written what my conscience dictated. Their revelations, their sufferings- which I know so well- are more serious and painful than mine. I , for one, will cling to Psalm 38: But I trust in you, O Lord; and you, O Lord my God, will answer me.

And thus, generous friend and kind reader who has come this far, allow me to conclude -hoping against the odds- with this thought from Max Picard:

In every other place, besides prayer, man’s silence serves his word; but now, in prayer, the word serves man’s silence: The word guides human silences toward divine silence.

From a place in the Mexican countryside,

Jose Barba Martín,

June, 2002.

(Translated from the Spanish by Paul Lennon MA).

 

No To LC American Boarding & Apostolic Schools [and Novitiates?]

General Confession with Fr. Maciel and a tribute to my real father
By one of First Irish LC’s

The author explores the dangers of the Legion of Christ’s Apostolic Schools in the light of OLD & NEW allegations of sexual abuse by Founder Marcial Maciel of his younger seminarians and that of other Legionaries in minor seminaries. The article questions the training and credentials of Legionary seminarians as formators of adolescents. Structural discrepancies with official Church Teaching are mentioned.


Introduction
From Legion of Christ official website:

FOR YOUNG MEN WHO WANT TO BE PRIESTS
The Legion’s apostolic schools worldwide, including this one in Center Harbor, New Hampshire, aim to give young men in grades 7-12, who are really thinking about the priesthood, what they will need to discover Christ’s call and prepare for it.

LEGION NOVICES AVOID TRAINING IN ‘SAFE ENVIRONMENT’ FOR CCD CLASSES AT LOCAL PARISH
[from exlegionaries.com discussion board, thread: ‘safe environment’]

Posted on 9/19/2005 at 10:22 AM

Safe Environment ?
In the spring I stopped by St Brigid’s church in Cheshire and noticed in their bulletin that they were looking for CCD teachers because they would no longer have the services of the LC’s when I asked an LC why not they said they didn’t know. At WYD I met parishioners from St Brigid’s so I asked them why the LC aren’t teaching there anymore and they said the superior would not let them take the safe environment course required to teach in a parish school. I was wondering if that was to keep the seminarians from realizing they do not live in a safe environment?


Part One

WHAT IS CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE AND ASSAULT CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE.
One in 3 girls and 1 in 6 boys are sexually assaulted before the age of 18

Handbook on Sexual Abuse of Children, Russell, 1988

CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE IS ANY EXPLOITIVE OR COERCIVE SEXUAL EXPERIENCE INVOLVING A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18. THIS CAN INCLUDE: VOYEURISM, EXHIBITIONISM, PORNOGRAPHY, FONDLING, ORAL/ANAL/VAGINAL INTERCOURSE, AND PROSTITUTION.

Child Sexual Abuse does not necessarily involve penetration or even physical contact. Often beginning with seemingly innocent intrusions into the child’s personal space, the offender slowly tests and conditions the child to accept abuse which may escalate over a period of time.

The stereotype of child molesters as mentally unstable, dangerous-looking strangers is not statistically accurate:

  • Only 10-15% of offenders are strangers to their victims.
  • Often, child victims have trusting, dependent relationships with their offenders.
  • Ordinary-seeming men and women, even respected community members, sexually assault children.

Child sexual abuse occurs within all racial, ethnic, religious, educational, gender, social, and economic classes.

Although offenders may use physical force to perpetrate abuse, more typically they rely on threats. bribery, emotional force, or simply the force of their authority over the child. Sometimes, this force is implied rather than overt.

THREATS: ‘If you tell you’ll be sent home and lose your vocation.’

BRIBERY: ‘You will have special exceptions to the rule and privileges.’

EMOTIONAL: ‘You won’t be my special friend any more’

AUTHORITY: ‘This is our secret -don’t tell. They wouldn’t understand.’
[Adapted by the

writer from: Child Sexual Assault brochure, VAASA, http://www.vaasa.org. Feel free to request]

 

WHAT IS SEXUAL ASSAULT?
It is not ‘crime of passion’. IT IS A CRIME OF VIOLENCE, POWER, AND CONTROL. It occurs when a person is forced, threatened, coerced or manipulated and tricked into sexual contacts against his or her will. No one asks to be sexually abused -it is the perpetrator who decides to hurt someone. Sexual abuse is never the victim’s fault.

WHO ARE THE PERPETRATORS?
Because of the mistaken belief that sexual assault is sexually motivated, it is often assumed that anyone who would sexually assault a male is after sex. Therefore, we assume that a perpetrator of male sexual abuse must be either a heterosexaul woman or a homosexual man. But sexual assault is not about sex -it’s about violence, power, hostility and domination. It’s an attempt to hurt someone. It is possible for a woman to assault a man; and some men who commit sexual assaults are gay. But most sexual assaults of men are committed by ‘straight’ or heterosexual men.

WHY?
Sometimes, a person who wants to control or dominate others doesn’t care who they dominate. Sometimes, as IN AN ALL MALE SETTING, SUCH AS A PRISON OR A BOYS’ SCHOOL, ONLY MEN ARE AVAILABLE. AND SOMETIMES, MEN WHO ARE THREATENED BY THE IDEA OF HOMOSEXUALITY WILL ASSAULT MEN WHO THEY THINK MAY BE GAY -WHETHER THEY ARE OR NOT.

[See ‘Male Survivors of Sexual Assault’ brochure, VAASA, http://www.vaasa.org]

Part Two

THE LEGION OF CHRIST AS A POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS PLACE
I am at Sanborns restaurant at the ‘Plaza de las Estrellas’ mall in Mexico City?s Anzures district on Saturday, September 10, 2005. Sitting across from me, Dr. Fernando Gonzalez interviews me about my experiences with the Legion of Christ, against the background of pedophilia. I tell him honestly I was never sexually abused in the Legion, nor was I ever approached in an inappropriate way by any member.

Entering the LC at age 17 and 7 months, I admit I was very immature mentally, emotionally, and spiritually; naive and sexually unaware, too. However, as the son of a warm and structured home, I had strong relationships with my mother her only son- and with my father -we were ‘boon companions’. He was very ‘blue collar’ and a man of simple pleasuresTogether we went to sports events on his Excelsior 125cc motorbike which would often breakdown. A small and practical man, he liked mechanics, electricity and carpentry, with a passion for soccer, boxing and fishing. Sitting by the side of this quiet and polite person as we waited for the fish to nibble off Dun Laoghaire Pier I learned the silence of men and the art of closeness without words.
NUESTRO PADRE, OUR FATHER, MACIEL

Soon after joining the Legion in Bundoran, County Donegal, my confreres and I were introduced to Fr. Maciel, a tall, thin, pale Mexican with thinning brown hair, big manicured hands, as he smiled through his glasses with cold blue eyes. He was the Founder of the Legion of Christ and a Holy Man. We were soon told that Legionaries called him Nuestro Padre , (Our Father;) though not as in the Lord?s Prayer, which in Spanish begins with the words in the opposite order, Padre Nuestro].

Our Father, with the help of the whole Legionary apparatus, was portrayed as a caring and solicitous father, who thereby evoked openness, trust and closeness in his children. But with me the closeness did not take. My relationship with my biological father was too strong and present. I did not need the affection of another father, even though this one was supposedly a saint. Perhaps, I was subconsciously not trusting of male religious figures. With one father in heaven and my dad on earth, I did not need the affection of a third.

Let us imagine, however, a teenager whose relationship with his earthly father is not firm and caring. Would he not tend to gravitate towards this Super Father who wanted to be his confidante, guide, and mediator with God?

FR. MACIEL AND THE FIRST APOSTOLICS
Let us imagine next a preadolescent boy who goes to the Apostolic School in Mexico City in the 1940s, 50s, 60s and 70s. Nuestro Padre could be here, there and everywhere in the Legion house. There were not that many Legion members and few were the houses. When absent he made his presence felt through general and personal letters, as a form of community and individual guidance. What a strong impression he must have made on these first ApostolicosThey were leaving the relative anonymity of small Mexican towns for the exciting and attractive Apostolic School in Tlalpan with its playing fields, bright red uniforms, good education and a swimming pool with a diving board. Mexicans are fearless and skilled divers and swimmers. Mostly from families as large as five, ten or fifteen children, they must have felt very special when they received the personal attention of the Padre Prefects who supervised them and took care of all their needs. Above the prefects was the Padre RectorSpiritual Director. The Prefects and Rector became these children?s fathers in their regular lives. And above the Rector was Nuestro Padrewho would drop in occasionally, bringing relief from the daily routine. For Nuestro Padre was the Founder, a Spiritually Gifted Man of God. When he was with the community, everything was special and improved, including richer food, more games and recreation, movies and special excursions. To top it all off he would also celebrate a Solemn Mass, flanked by the Rector and Prefects.

ABSOLUTE TRANSPARENCY WITH AND TRUST IN NUESTRO PADRE
The greatest privilege of all was to go to confession to Nuestro Padre, because he was so close to God and he knew God?s Will for you. So you were sure you would get the right answer to your questions and doubts, especially regarding your vocation to serve God in the Legion

The Brother Bursar took care of one?s material needs. The Padre Prefect took care of one?s studies, discipline and ordinary religious life. Nuestro Padre took care of one?s spiritual needs, and what a privilege it was to have him around, he, the Founder, inspired directly by God, with a direct line to the Holy Spirit, a Living Saint, who could read your soul and guide you along the paths of the Lord.

Total Transparency and Complete Truest in your Superior is an essential element of Legion Spirit and Mystique, and this was heightened in the case of Nuestro Padre. The Apostolics opened up to and totally trusted this Other Christwith their histories, trials and tribulations. Many a tear was shed during those confessions and spiritual directions in the Legion the distinction if often blurred. Tears of relief after unburdening one?s soul, tears of gratitude, maybe even of tenderness as the boy felt Gods forgiveness through Nuestro Padre?s loving care. [As a young Legionary I read a booklet written by Fr. Javier Tena,LC, one of the first Apostolics from Mexico. Called Nuestro Padre in my Child Soul, ‘Nuestro Padre en mi alma de Nino’, it described in idyllic terms the Apostolic?s life.

MY GENERAL CONFESSION TO NUESTRO PADRE
I had the privilege of going to confession to Nuestro Padre for the first time before my Religious Profession in Salamanca, September, 1962 [I was 18 and 10 months old]. By then my Spanish was good enough. Together with my 7 Irish cofounder companions I took my temporal vows after only one year Novitiate ??mine mostly in crisis [major depressive episode?], interpreted as my own personal dark night of the soul. It was suggested to me by my spiritual director/superior that I make a general confession to Nuestro Padre to take advantage of the special graces I would thus receive through the Founder and as the best way to prepare me for the religious life.

During the relatively uneventful and sheltered life I had lived before entering the Holy Novitiate at age 17, I had accumulated two sins against purity which troubled my somewhat scrupulous conscience and about which I felt very ashamed. Before entering the Legion I had unloaded one to a Carmelite friar at St. Teresas Clarendon St., Dublin.

In fear and trembling I unloaded the 2nd to Nuestro Padre, Man of God. I do not recall any earth-shattering advice or apocalyptic revelation. I felt he was kind. At the end, I kissed the end of his stole as a sign of reverence and gratitude. He may have brushed my cheek with the tassel in a fatherly way. I experienced a great sense of relief because I had been able to get rid of that sin. I dont remember any advice. Now, I had no sin on my soul, I was free through the Sacrament of Confession, and I was ready to take on my vows. My interviewer Fernando insists, was there nothing, not the slightest sexual innuendo in this encounter with Fr Maciel? No, nothing. And you were not aware of any abuse going on around you as appears from the testimonies of others? Non whatsoever.

Against the background of the two dozen testimonies of sexual abuse from the 40s and 50s, and those which are beginning to appear regarding the 60s-70s, why was I and others so totally unaware? Could it be that Fr. Maciel is a Master of the Game of secret societies, with their isolated concentric circles of information/power? Maciel in the middle surrounded by a first cadre of unconditionals who silently acquiesce to his power? Only The Master knows everything. The unconditionals know more than the following circle, and so on. Those within the circle of abuse are isolated from the community at large, which is totally oblivious to what goes on behind the infirmary door? Reading the chilling descriptions in John Le Carres A Perfect Spy, and Solzhenitsyns Gulag Archipelago regarding secrecy, isolation and control might lead to such speculations…

SEXUAL ABUSE IN CONFESSION AND SPIRITUAL DIRECTION
One Legionary in pastoral ministry in Sacramento, CA, got into hot water a few years ago for questioning a child about his/her sexual problems. The Legion solution? Send him back to the Quintana Roo Mission? My question is: What about the Maya children? Are they not important? From this and other documented testionies there seems to be a recurring theme of Legion Spiritual Director/Superiors inquiring into students sexual experience. A THOROUGH HISTORY OF SEXUAL EXPERIENCE SEEMS TO BE PART OF A CANDIDATE’S SCREENING, CARRIED OUT BY LEGIONARIES SUCH AS FR OWEN KEARNS AND OTHERS. How vulnerable these children and adolescents are to abuse by unscrupulous, inquisitive, curious, prying, probing and potentially abusive superiors! Aren’t the ‘examiners’ in danger of giving in to their own prurient curiosity? Isn’t there a grave danger of such intimate material being used against the candidate in the future, through the Legion system of unprotected communication between superiors?

Think of all the Apostolics, Candidates and Novices that opened their histories and hearts to Nuestro Padre! Did he pry into their vulnerable souls? Did they feel obliged and privileged to tell him everything about themselves? Did he ask about their difficulties with Holy Purity? Did he ever overstep his boundaries with any of them? Did he walk through the doors that they in their naiveté left open, full of gullibility, innocence and trust?

When I recall now that confession with Nuestro Padre, in the light of allegations of sexual impropriety, I tremble. I am overcome with a sense of revulsion and of relief. Did the sin that I confessed somehow immunize me against improper approaches from Nuestro Padre and other Legionary Superiors? This is not idle speculation, as you will see from the following.

ONGOING VATICAN INVESTIGATION OF FR. MACIEL AND SHOCKING RECENT REVELATION
By all it is well known that a ‘new’ Vatican Investigation into Fr Maciel’s sexual abuse of his first seminarians is presently underway. This is separate from the 1956-58 wider investigation into his drug use, abuse of power and questionable relationships with his seminarians, carried out by the Sacred Congregation for Religious. I am not saying that the present investigator does not have access to the old archives. This investigation is being carried out by the Promotor of Justice for the Congregation for the Faith, a separate Vatican department with greater powers to sanction. As the investigation of the original 8 accusers was underway, more men from that generation and the following came forward, particularly in Mexico City during early April 2005 [see Regain Press Release and corresponding articles].

As I prepared to attend a conference in Madrid in mid July a shocking revelation was made to me by one of my Irish co-founder colleagues, in the sense that he too had been sexually abused by Father Maciel from 1962-1969. This allegation, out of the blue and totally ‘incomtaminated by’ the other accusations, is being clarified and researched by reporters, and has been reported to Monsignor Scicluna, the Vatican Prosecutor. I am not at liberty to disclose further information. This fact doubly impacts me: it proves that Fr Maciel’s sexual abuse did not stop with the early generations; and it brings the abuse even closer to home for me because I know the abused personally, we trained together, and I have even less reason to doubt the facts. It also prompts speculation regarding whether extensive sexual abuse by the Founder may have spawned an epidemic in the Legion and whether such abuse is now endemic to or widespread in the Institution.

PARENTS, DO NOT EXPOSE YOUR CHILDREN TO THE DANGER OF ABUSE!
What therapeutic skill do these Prefects, Teachers and Directors possess? Are they trained in Spiritual Guidance? By what institute? Are they trained in counseling and psychotherapy? Have they had the necessary background checks for someone closely involved in the education of minors? Remember, ONE EPISODE OF ABUSE WOUNDS A CHILD FOREVER!

At least two periods of serious sexual abuse has been documented regarding the Legion Apostolic School in Ontaneda, Santander, Spain. Isolated cases of sexual abuse have been reported about the New Hampshire Apostolic School. Testimonies exist regarding sexual abuse in the Irish Novitiate.

[From a posting on the discussion board:]

‘Protecting God’s Children’ – Virtus Program
mikeinnj – 9/14/2005 at 05:17 PM

Many (if not most) dioceses in the US now require abuse awareness training for all clergy, teachers, staff, volunteers through the Protecting God’s Children – Virtus program (which, by the way, I find very informative). Considering the large numbers of RC programs for children and young people, and the highly visible contact with young people that the LC has, are the LC’s/RC’s getting this same training that other Catholics around the US are REQUIRED to do? This would include teachers in LC/RC run schools. Are the bishops in those dioceses where there is an LC/RC presence making sure this training is taking place, especially for RC people working with kids? Or does the LC/RC consider themselves exempt from or above all this?

 

Finally

STRUCTURAL DISCREPANCIES WITH OFFICIAL CHURCH GUIDELINES
Even if the above considerations regarding the danger of sexual abuse and assault fall on deaf parental ears, Church Leaders still need to carefully review the Legion training system in the light of the official and authorized doctrine of the Catholic Church for seminaries. We respectfully submit that, besides the above mentioned dangers, there are other problems at Legion Minor Seminaries. Because of the lack of space, I will simply underline [uppercasing] some aspects. I am shocked to see how some BISHOPS seem to be turning a blind eye to gaping STRUCTURAL DISCREPANCIES, or at least potential dangers, in the Legion system. The following teaching’s last paragraph also shows Catholic parents that the traditional minor seminary or apostolic school is NOT THE ONLY OR BEST WAY to foster priestly vocations.

On another, though related, note, it is a crying shame that exiting members from the Legion and the Regnum Christi -particularly women- often do not have properly validated studies, thus unduly prolonging and jeopardizing their recovery process.
MINOR SEMINARIES

In minor seminaries erected to develop the seeds of vocations, the students should be prepared by special religious formation, particularly through appropriate spiritual direction, to follow Christ the Redeemer with generosity of spirit and purity of heart. Under the fatherly direction of the superiors, and with the proper COOPERATION OF THE PARENTS, their daily routine should be in accord with the age, the character and the stage of development of adolescence and fully adapted to the NORMS OF A HEALTHY PSYCHOLOGY. Nor should the fitting opportunity be lacking for social and cultural contacts and for CONTACT WITH ONE’S OWN FAMILY.

Moreover, whatever is decreed in the following paragraphs about major seminaries is also be adapted to the minor seminary to the extent that it is in accord with its purpose and structure. Also, STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY THE STUDENTS SHOULD BE SO ARRANGED THAT THEY CAN EASILY CONTINUE SHOULD THEY CHOOSE A DIFFERENT STATE OF LIFE.

With equal concern the seeds of vocations among adolescents and young men are also to be fostered in those SPECIAL INSTITUTES, which in accord with local circumstances, serve the purpose of a minor seminary as well as among those who are trained in OTHER SCHOOLS or by OTHER EDUCATIONAL MEANS. Finally, those institutions and other schools initiated for those with a belated vocation are to be carefully developed.

[Decree on Priestly Training, number 3, II Vatican Council]

Understanding the Curious Role of Stanislaw Dziwisz in the saga of Marcial Maciel

By ReGAIN Staff

Thursday, May 24, 2007
In relation to the long-simmering case against Marcial Maciel, who is credibly charged with sexually abusing young men, serious allegations have now been made by both the Polish periodical Głos Wielkopolski and the Italian newspaper La Stampa against Archbishop Stanisław Dziwisz of Krakow. For forty years, this man served as personal secretary to Karol Woltyla, twenty-six of which were after Woltyla’s elevation to the papacy. Specific anecdotes have been related about evidence of sexual misconduct by high-ranking clergymen being personally given to Dziwisz to be handed on to John Paul II – only to have it hidden away undelivered.

In the case of Archbishop Paetz of Poznań, Austria, the periodicals relate that Dziwisz was personally informed of scandalous behavior of the ordinary by the distressed members of local clergy and yet Dziwisz did nothing – he took no action himself, nor did he give the information to the Holy Father for whom it was intended. We can assume for the sake of charity, that he wanted to spare the Pope, that he wanted to avoid a public scandal, that he wanted to maintain the integrity of the institution – but all for naught. The pope eventually found out and acted quickly, the scandal only grew because of the delay, and the integrity of the institution suffered enormously.

Likewise, a Mexican priest and canon lawyer, Fr Antonio Ornelas brought the charges against Maciel to the attention of Msgr. Dwizisz – in Polish to bridge any language gap – to no avail.
The newspaper claims that, similar to the case of the letter concerning Archbishop Paetz, the attempt by Fr. Ornelas regarding Stanisław Dziwisz was in vain. It is almost certain that John Paul II was never informed about the situation, otherwise he would have taken steps leading to an investigation (as he did so when he found out about Archbishop Paetz).

Interestingly, the way that he did find out about this scandalous facts about Maciel was through a close personal friend, doctor and author Wanda Póltawska. Priests associated with the problem knew that she dined occasionally with John Paul II (with whom she had collaborated decades earlier on the “theology of the body”) and thus they entrusted to her the delicate task of passing along the information that had previously been unable to gain a hearing. As a result, the case against Maciel was opened quietly and actions have been taken.

Did Dziwisz Interfere with Justice?

Is it possible that a close relationship between Msgr Dziwisz and the Legionary founder clouded his judgment in this matter? Regain member Glenn Favreau, who worked closely with the present head of the Legion, Alvaro Corcuera, remembers vividly that Dziwisz kept in very close touch with Corcuera – even making sure to send him postcards from every trip taken outside the Vatican. Additionally, the Legion, which regularly sends its benefactors letters to beg for food, toiletries, and money to pay the heating bills for poor but enthusiastic seminarians, had the resources to finance the finest cars – not only for their founder – but for Dziwisz and other Vatican officials, for who showed their gratitude in various ways.

The Legion itself boasts of its close relationship with the Dziwisz, who chose their seminary, Regina Apostolorum on via Aurelia, for a very special celebration (which included the pope) after he was made a bishop in 1998.
Bishop Dziwisz had arranged a luncheon reception for family and friends. John Paul II ate lunch with more than 600 guests, most of whom were lifelong friends from the archdiocese of Krakow or other Polish pilgrims. Since the Pope arrived to the college before his secretary (Bishop Dziwisz was detained by well-wishers at the Vatican), John Paul was able to briefly meet with members of the young religious congregation and then personally greet his secretary upon his arrival, accompanied by Fr. Marcial Maciel, founder of the Legionaries of Christ.

This scene was repeated in March, 2006 when Dziwisz was made a cardinal.
A great celebration this evening in Rome for the new cardinal Stanislaus Dziwisz who met about four hundred people who in the course of these last two decades had had to do with Pope Wojytla for a great variety of reasons. Ecclesiastics of every rank, medics of the dead Pope, beginning with Professor Renato Buzzonetti and a large group of doctors from the Gemelli Hospital, men of the bodyguard, led by the head of Vatican surveillance, Camillo Cibin, but also simple faithful friends of the many years passed in Rome and some journalists, participated in the celebration at the University of the Legionaries of Christ…

“I thank God,” the cardinal concluded, “for all the wonders He granted me to share in during the years spent next to Pope Wojtyla.” The choir of the Legionaries of Christ animated the evening with multi-ethnic songs and Italian regional songs. The executions of O sole mio, Romagna mia and Funicolì funiculà were particularly applauded, but a jazz version of Emanuel, one of the hymns of the World Youth Days, also had great success.

The importance of Dziwisz’ role was clarified by John Paul II himself when he spoke these words at the Episcopal ordination of his dear friend and secretary:

“The Spirit of the Lord consecrates you, my dear friend Stanisław, from my own archdiocese of Krakow,” he said haltingly. “Thirty-five years ago, I myself ordained you priest in the Cathedral of Wawel, and three years later, named you my chaplain. From the beginning of my Petrine ministry, you have been at my side as a faithful secretary, sharing with me the exhaustion and the joy, the hopes and the emotions.” The Pope has just named him adjunct Prefect of the Pontifical Household, since his work as personal secretary involves him in determining the papal agenda. John Paul II himself said to Bishop Stanislaw, “As adjunct Prefect, you will put your great experience to work for the Pontifical Household, to the benefit of all those who approach the Successor of Peter for their ministry or as pilgrims.”

Thus, Dziwisz – who thought highly enough of the Legion to choose their house of formation for two of the most important celebrations of his career – was the one who determined the papal agenda and the essential gatekeeper through which the faithful could access His Holiness the Pope.

Personal experiences of Regain members can attest to the fact that the gatekeeper could – and did – keep that gate firmly shut to critical information that related to the allegations against Maciel. José Barba-Martin, PhD gives one specific example of how protocols became meaningless when applied to the Maciel case:
Canon lawyer Don Antonio Roqueñi and I sent a letter in Polish to then Monsignor Stanislaw Dziwisz on November 11th, 2002 requesting action be taken in the Maciel case. The letter was signed by Don Antonio, Arturo Jurado and me. I also included a Spanish version of the same letter for Cardinal Ratzinger, together with an extra note in Latin; attached was a return address in Mexico City and two contact phone numbers in Rome. Contrary to international agreements signed by the Vatican, its Post Office at Piazza San Pietro (St. Peter’s Square) refused to give me a receipt. As an alternative, the Italian Post Office did. I am still waiting for an official note in Italian from the Palazzo Pontificio (Vatican Palace) acknowledging receipt of that letter.

If one could make the case that – for a variety of reasons – the papal secretary thought it best to keep such information from John Paul II, it would explain much, but even refusing to acknowledge official correspondence beggars one’s patience in the matter. In this way, efforts to protect the institution instead have allowed aspersions to be cast on the victims, tarring them maliciousness troublemakers. This is unconscionable.

Dziwisz’ hidden ability to run interference as he did fueled the constant refrain of the Movement’s defenders: If the allegations had merit, they would have been made earlier, and How could Pope John Paul II have been so blind to the scandals involving Maciel? Faithful Catholics assume that the charges were contrived later to vent an animus against the Church, against her teachings on sexuality, or to undermine her ability to preach the Gospel. Presumption in this case (as with countless rumors over the years relating to clerical misbehavior) always lay with the pious man in a cassock, as opposed to the confused child, the unreliable adolescent, or the “failed” ex-priest. Conventional wisdom is that those closest to God are systematically subject to a host of undignified attacks … and yet perhaps “conventional wisdom” can also be a most handy refuge for the clever malefactor.

So what have we learned from the Church scandals?

In the first lesson, we see that the general public has been rattled to its core to find that dysfunction and shameful actions are ubiquitous – even among the faithful. Piety, uprightness, and visible success in the worlds of business, the arts, or the religious sphere are no guarantees of integrity. Indeed, the most difficult lesson to absorb is that no one is immune from the possibility of having toxic defects that lie hidden from the world. “We have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God,” and, interestingly, “judge not lest ye be judged” as a platitude for avoiding casting aspersions can be turned on its head – for we know not the predilections of each heart – good or ill.

Secondly, what we have learned from seeing respected individuals fall from grace is that institutions are not well-served by patching over the dysfunction of individuals. The more that such indiscretions are covered up to “protect” the wider public, the more the institution itself is indicted as a fraud. Even if there were good intentions in “saving face,” the insult to the wider world is the insinuation that people are incapable of processing individual defects, that the office was more important than the person who held it, or more importantly, that some people simply are incapable of grievous sin because of their vested responsibilities. What sheer and utter nonsense.

Thirdly, we find that the Gospel of Jesus Christ is absolutely true: “the truth shall set you free.” Just as Christ could not be conquered by death, just as the apostles insisted on preaching despite opposition (and whose words come down intact to our very generation), and just as so many long-suffering Christians kept the faith in gulags, amidst tortures, and despite relentless persecution – the truth will prevail. The Church has been used as scapegoat, as stick to beat others, as a step-stool for self-promotion, as leverage against enemies, as convenient enemy herself – but no matter the historical twist, the Bride of Christ bears the Christ-child in season and out, in order to offer the Eternal One to a dark and thirsty world. God is faithful to His promises.

So as we return to the specifics of the case against Marcial Maciel, is it possible that some in the Church were capable of misreading the truth about integrity?

Is it possible that the cassock of a holy man allowed people to assume that he was above such reproach?
Is it possible that the desire of highly-place ministers to have the Church appear as a bastion of integrity allowed them to ignore indications to the contrary?
Is it possible that the truth about sexual abuse of the innocent could be hidden forever without disastrous consequences?
As events have unfolded in the last five years, we find that the answers to the first two questions are “Yes.” Certainly many highly respected individuals have been found sorely wanting due to a variety of defects. Likewise the best intentions of some people have only exacerbated the harms, due to a misreading of what we now know to be highly toxic behavior. And finally, truth is a hammer that will not respect convention, human respect, or empty platitudes.

God will not be mocked, and the truth will not remain hidden forever. Years of scandal have shown the world that poison has inevitable consequences. Dysfunction is now something that families everywhere are learning to identify, dissect and treat. The Church’s ministers must do likewise – or be risk something more terrible: willful obstinacy, intransigency and sin.

Sources: (click on links)

http://www.30giorni.it/us/brevi.asp?id=255

http://www.zenit.org/english/archive/9803/zw980325.html

http://serwisy.gazeta.pl/kraj/1,34397,3877334.html

http://www.glos.com/forum/index.php?kat=2&temat=1994

Someone Is Lying . . .But Is It The 100 Alleged Abuse Victims Or Fr. Maciel?

Special to The Wanderer

 

By BRIAN MERSHON

 

The Wanderer Newspaper
http://thewandererpress.com/a8-10-2006.htm

Issue Date August 10, 2006

 

By BRIAN MERSHON

Since the official May 19 statement from the Holy See suspending Fr. Marcial Maciel, founder of the Legion of Christ, from all public ministry, more information has become available to shed light on the case from additional sources. The following letter and interview, a new charge of sexual abuse against Fr. Maciel, is an exclusive to The Wanderer.
Francisco Gonzalez-Parga, a former priest and seminarian with the Legionaries of Christ for 20 years, wrote an open letter to Fr. Juan Pedro Oriol, LC, and Messrs. Jorge Suarez Huizare and Arturo Lucke Gracian, after reading an article in which Fr. Oriol referred to the now-suspended Fr. Maciel as “a good, integral, and loyal man.� The public letter appeared on July 6, in the El Informador, a Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, newspaper. It was in response to an article headlined “Discover the Truth,� in the Mexican newspaper the Mural.
In an interview with The Wanderer, Gonzalez-Parga said the reason he has come public now is that he thought it was necessary due to “the obstinacy and lack of integrity of the Legionaries in their reactions to the sentence issued from the Vatican� and because of “their efforts to cover up the truth and to protect Fr. Maciel,� he said. “I thought it was necessary to put an end to that.�
Gonzalez-Parga said he was initially sexually abused by Fr. Maciel when he was 15 years old, and that he “cannot number� the actual instances. He also named a dozen ex-priests, seminarians and/or men who have worked for, or who still work for, the Legion whom he knows were also sexually abused by Fr. Maciel.
Besides the numerous instances of reported sexual abuse by the suspended Fr. Maciel, Gonzalez-Parga told The Wanderer that he knew firsthand of two other priests in the Legion who he claims have also sexually abused boys. He named Fr. Guillermo Izquierdo and Fr. Salvador Maciel, no relation to Fr. Marcial Maciel, the founder of the order who was recently suspended.
Gonzalez-Parga was ordained to the Legion by Pope Paul VI in St. Peter’s Basilica on July 6, 1966. He said he left the priesthood in 1970 and has struggled with physical and psychological health issues ever since. He served the Legion as prefect of postulates (candidates to the novitiate) in Ontaneda, Spain. Later, he was assistant of the master of novices in Ireland for three years and prefect of studies in the College of Rome. He also spent time serving the Holy See in the Sacred Congregation for Bishops.
Gonzalez-Parga was one of several new alleged victims of Fr. Maciel who was interviewed by Msgr. Charles Scicluna, the Holy See’s promoter of justice from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF). During the week of April 2, 2005, Msgr. Scicluna interviewed new alleged victims of Fr. Maciel, including Francisco Gonzalez-Parga, Carlos de la Isla, and Salvador Andrade. Another alleged victim, Juan Jose Gonzalez, was not personally interviewed, but instead issued a sworn statement to the CDF.
Gonzalez-Parga’s unedited letter follows:

+ + +

I read your review of the film, “The Da Vinci Code,� and I am in complete agreement. However, I was struck by your comment in which, on the one hand, regarding Fr. Marcial Maciel, you refer to him as “a good, upright and loyal man.� On the other hand, you suggest to your readers that they “always seek to discover the truth because only through truth are they made free and happy.�
In the same spirit of love for the truth which you recommend, I wish to inform you that I was a priest of the Legionaries of Christ. In the twenty years devoted to work and study when I belonged to the Legion, I obtained a degree in philosophy and a doctorate in theology from the Gregorian University and was Prefect of Studies at the Legionaries of Christ College of Higher Studies in Rome.
Now in the spirit of helping you also to find the truth, I want you to know that at a young age I was a victim of outright sexual abuse, perpetrated in a deceitful and premeditated way, by Fr. Maciel. For this reason and in spite of having been ordained a priest in Rome by then Pope Paul VI [From González-Parga’s statement above in an interview with this writer: “I was ordained a priest in July 1966 by Pope Paul VI in the Basilica of St. Peter in Rome.�], I felt compelled to abandon the Legion and the priesthood, taking with me all the moral and psychological damage that you might imagine. For many years I have lived with illness, have been in danger of losing my life, and have experienced continual depression as a result of the abuse committed against my person by Fr. Maciel. Even now I am suffering from the consequences.
But this is only my story. What about the 100 or more cases reported under sworn oath to the Holy See? I have since forgiven Fr. Maciel and I hope that God enlightens him and helps him to acknowledge the grave sin he has committed against those who were his victims and their families, against society and against those Legionaries of Christ who remain members in good faith of the congregation.
I am addressing you publicly because I am faced with such deceit, falsehood and lies, and because it pains me to know that there are so many people who refuse to accept the truth and still others who “impede truth through injustice.� For some reason they have a need not to want to “search for� the truth or to even “see it.� Otherwise, they would realize that, if Pope Benedict XVI felt obliged for reasons of conscience to take such drastic action against Fr. Maciel by retiring him from all public practice of his priestly ministry, it is because there was sufficient evidence for him to do so — in spite of the dishonor such an act could bring to the Catholic Church, to the person of Pope John Paul II and to his own person, and in spite of the damage this could cause not only to the credibility of the Legionaries of Christ and to the Regnum Christi Movement, but also to the economic, political and social advantages these institutions bring to the Vatican and the Holy See.
It is the opinion of many thinking people that the slight punishment imposed on Fr. Maciel by the pope is the result of a conflict of interests arising out of the above-mentioned advantages the Legion provides to the Vatican and to the papacy. Therefore, instead of trying him for atrocious sexual crimes and abuse of power committed against young candidates for the priesthood, they have hidden him from public view so that he may live in comfortable opulence, attended by his unconditionally loyal servants from the Legion. He does so in light of the Pope’s recommendation that he use his time for prayer and penitence. Fr. Maciel will need prayer and penitence because God cannot be mocked. What he needs is courage, honesty and genuine repentance in order to publicly ask for forgiveness from those he has wronged, since this is the only way to vindicate himself and his congregation, and, by so doing, compensate his victims in some slight way.
Seek the truth yourself, Father Oriol, as you advise others to do, for it is truth that will make you free and happy, as you have said. Stop participating in works of darkness, believing perhaps in good faith that you are a bearer of truth and light.
“But who so shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and [that] he were drowned in the depth of the sea.� Matthew 18, 6.
Please feel free to contact me regarding any clarification.

Francisco González P.
Former priest of the Legionaries of Christ
Zapopan, Jalisco (Mexico)
(Translation by REGAIN staff)

The Legion’s Response

Before going to press and in the interest of fairness, The Wanderer contacted the Legion of Christ requesting a response to these allegations from either Fr. Anthony Bannon (North American superior) or Fr. Owen Kearns (publisher of National Catholic Register) regarding this new allegation, as well as their reactions to Jorge Cardinal Medina Estevez’s comments following in this article.
“I don’t think either one of our Fathers would be interested in commenting on those particular items. We have really said all we are able to say about the situation, and we are busy moving forward working on our apostolates and the work we are doing,� said Legion of Christ spokesman Jim Fair.
Despite the increasingly public and mounting evidence against the Legion of Christ’s founder, the Legion of Christ continues to claim that Fr. Maciel is completely innocent of any wrongdoing whatsoever, while continuing to claim to be “obedient� to the Holy See.
In a recent article appearing in Our Sunday Visitor, http://www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=20487, Legion spokesman Jim Fair was on the record as saying that he had absolutely no doubt that Fr. Maciel is innocent of accusations that he sexually abused seminarians decades ago. He said that any statements to the contrary amount to persecution of a holy man — the kind of persecution Jesus referred to in the Sermon on the Mount when He said, “Blessed are those who hate and persecute you for holiness’ sake; you shall see God.�
González-Parga said the Legion’s comparison to Fr. Maciel’s suspension from public ministry with the unjustly crucified sinless Servant who died on the cross at Calvary has “made me to get sick because that has been one of the most irreverent and blasphemous forms of covering up and distorting the truth.
“At the same time they do not have the least sensibility to realize that they are at the same time disqualifying the Pope and the CDF’s decision.�

Logical Fallacy

To confirm this system-wide denial of any wrongdoing on the part of Fr. Maciel, the following is an excerpt from a letter issued by T. Godfrey Mackenzie, executive director of the Highlands School in Dallas, a school run by the Legionaries of Christ: “Fr. Maciel is following the path of other saints and founders that have been accused and carried the cross of a tarnished personal reputation in the name of redemptive suffering. St. Padre Pio, St. John Bosco, and St. Teresa of Avila are examples of this path to sainthood.�
Michael Pennell, Ph.D., former principal of the very same Dallas-based Highlands School, offered the following interpretation of Mackenzie’s statement on Maciel. The syllogism Pennell extracted from these two brief sentences follows. “The major premise would be the following: Saints get persecuted even by members of the Church,� Pennell said. “The minor premise would be that Fr. Maciel is being persecuted. The conclusion the Legion reaches of course is Fr. Maciel is a saint,� he said. So every person who is “persecuted� by the Church, even if justly, should be called a saint while on earth? If he is being unjustly persecuted, which seems to be the Legion’s attitude, then how is this in keeping with their statement on being “obedient� to the Holy See?
Of course, in Christian charity, Catholics should all hope and pray that this may be the case. We should hope and pray and work for the eternal salvation of all mankind. However, in the current circumstances, taking the public suspension of ministry into account as well as the additional commentary by Cardinal Medina Estevez which follows, the timing of such a claim might be called imprudent at best.
The dozens of accusers against Fr. Maciel might not be so enamored by this claim of his sanctity during this time, especially in light of the heinous violations they allegedly endured for decades in silence.
The Legion of Christ’s official statement contains the following claim: “Facing the accusations made against him, he declared his innocence and, following the example of Jesus Christ, decided not to defend himself in any way.�
So, both Fr. Maciel and the Legion of Christ continue to publicly defend Fr. Maciel as completely innocent of all wrongdoing, while also being “obedient� to the Holy See. One Vatican source very close to the case, upon reviewing this statement, reportedly called this Fr. Maciel comparison to Jesus Christ, the sinless Lamb without spot, as “blasphemous�!

Perspective Of
Cardinal Medina Estevez

Jorge Cardinal Medina Estevez, the man who introduced the new Pope in April 2005, and a close confidant for years, was interviewed by Sebastián Vásquez R on the subject of Fr. Maciel’s suspension by La Tercera, a Chilean newspaper, which appeared in the May 25 edition. The Chilean cardinal had the following to say about the Fr. Maciel suspension:
“I believe that it is a decision of the Holy Father that he must have taken after taking many considerations into account. I know that he is an extremely sensitive person in his judgments who does not act in haste, so that if he took action in this way, it means that he had very serious reasons.�
La Tercera’s reporter Vasquez interviewed Fr. John O’Reilly, a Chilean spokesman for the Legion, who affirmed he was absolutely “convinced� of Maciel’s “absolute innocence.� When questioned by the reporter, the Chilean cardinal refused to offer any comment on Fr. O’Reilly’s opinion.
He did, however, describe the suspension of Maciel as “an administrative, prudential, and pastoral measure,� according to La Tercera, “because from the point of view of canon law, a process was not opened against the religious due to his age and health.� Cardinal Medina Estevez said this was in order to show mercy toward an aging person in accordance with Christian charity.
Nevertheless, he insists, “The Pope would never have made a decision of this type without fairly substantial reasons.�
“It is necessary to trust the Pope and to see that if he made a decision of this type, it is because in his conscience and before God he believed it was the best solution he could give to a public and consistent problem,� the cardinal said.
And then perhaps to emphasize that the Holy See most likely did not give unjust punishment to a sinless man, he said, “When there is a serious deed that has good factual substance, well, measures must be taken, because nothing should prevent authority from being exercised.�

Sandro Magister Weighs In

A top reporter on Church issues, especially as emanating from the Holy See, as a followup to his previous articles on the Legion of Christ and the Fr. Maciel case, recently offered an informed report. This analysis compiled by Sandro Magister and written originally by editor Lorenzo Prezzi, verifies that additional new evidence against Fr. Maciel was mounting up to the time of his announced suspension. Magister’s summary of Prezzi’s account includes the new accuser and alleged victim, Francisco Gonzalez-Parga, whose open letter is above.
This informed account also reveals that the innocent, spotless persecuted victim-saint as presented through the Legion of Christ’s numerous public responses, is not consistent with the Holy See’s serious disciplinary action against Fr. Maciel.
Magister’s summary of Prezzi’s analysis states:
“Two months since the canonical decision from the Vatican on Marcial Maciel Degollado, 86-year-old founder of the Legionaries of Christ, the biweekly magazine Il Regno (n. 12/2006, 6/15/06) of the Dehonian order, has dedicated three pages of commentary on the case under the signature of its editor, Lorenzo Prezzi.
“The analysis is the first one published in depth about the case in the Catholic media. Prezzi confirms the amplitude of the investigation and the great number of Maciel’s accusers:
“ ‘In 2005, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith sent an investigator, Fr. Charles Scicluna, to the USA in order to verify the charges made in written depositions. He spoke first with Juan Vaca, then with Paul Lennon, Carlos de Isla, Salvador Andrade, Francisco Gonzales-Parga, José Olvera, Alejandro Espinosa, and some 30 other witnesses. There were reportedly another 20 witnesses ready to speak out. All of the material gathered was brought to Rome, where it was studied and weighed [along with previous material obtained].’
“The article underscores that ‘at present, the Holy See, the Legionaries, and bishops have converged in emphasizing the charism of the foundation itself as opposed to the charism of its founder, the fruits of the Legion’s apostolate rather than the personal intuitions of Fr. Maciel,’ and observes that ‘this is not unprecedented in the history of religious orders.’
“As for future developments within the Legion, Prezzi writes: ‘Certainly, the Vatican censure will impose some discontinuity. This may be manifested in the choice of persons who will govern the Legion or in interventions (internal and external) regarding its formative system; and in particular, on two adjunctive vows which seemed to have been tailored specifically for an institutional figure reluctant to be governed by normal rules of control over all other religious families.’
“Prezzi summarizes those two adjunctive rules, which he thinks need to be modified, as ‘Superiors must not be criticized’ and ‘One must not aspire to internal tasks [i.e., within the movement].’
“The article does not comment on the objections and protests from some of Maciel’s accusers to the fact that the Vatican decided to sanction Fr. Maciel without proceeding with a canonical trial.
“However, the Code of Canon Law allows the Curia to do this. Canon 1342 starts this way: ‘Occasionally, if just reasons weigh against proceeding with a juridical trial, the penalty may be imposed or declared by extra-judicial decree.’
“And canon 1339 says that an extra-judicial penalty may be imposed on any person ‘about whom an investigation made (results in) the serious suspicion of having committed the offense.’ That is exactly what is found in the Vatican communiqué dated May 19, 2006.
“ ‘After having placed the results of the investigation under careful study, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, under the direction of its new Prefect, His Eminence, Cardinal William Joseph Levada, has decided — taking into account the advanced age of the Rev. Maciel as well as his delicate state of health — to renounce a canonical trial and to invite the Father to a private life of prayer and penitence, renouncing any public ministry. The Holy Father has approved these decisions’.�

 

Legionaries stay on task despite penance of its charismatic founder

By Michelle Martin
7/12/2006
Our Sunday Visitor (www.osv.com)
HUNTINGTON, Ind. (Our Sunday Visitor) – When Father Marcial Maciel Degollado, founder of the Legion of Christ, was asked by the Vatican not to exercise his priestly ministry in public in May, many took it as a slap – either a slap in the face to a visionary, charismatic leader who is being persecuted despite his innocence, or a slap on the wrist to a man who has betrayed and abused young men in his care.

Advertisement
Nobody, it seems, believes that Father Maciel, who also founded the Regnum Christi movement, either got what he deserved or deserved what he got.

Jim Fair, the U.S. spokesman for the Legion of Christ, a congregation of priests also known as the Legionaries, said the limits placed on Father Maciel’s ministry will have little practical effect on the day-to-day operations of the international religious order. Father Maciel, 86, stepped down as superior last year.

He was succeeded by Father Alvaro Corcuera Martinez del Rio, who met with Pope Benedict XVI in June and reportedly told him the Legionaries and its associated lay movement, Regnum Christi, were in “the most complete adherence” to the pope and his ministry.

“If there was any concern or doubt that the Vatican saw what we were doing as a good thing, that was put to rest,” Fair said.

What’s more, Fair has absolutely no doubt that Father Maciel is innocent of accusations that he sexually abused seminarians decades ago. Any statements to the contrary, he said, amount to persecution of a holy man – the kind of persecution Jesus referred to in the Sermon on the Mount when he said, “Blessed are those who hate and persecute you for holiness’ sake; you shall see God.”

Avoiding penalties

But Genevieve Kineke, a member of the ReGAIN network, the decision to ask Father Maciel from performing his priestly duties in public is nothing more than a ploy to avoid a formal canonical trial, which could establish guilt and result in more serious canonical penalties.

ReGAIN is a Virginia-based association of former members of the Legionaries of Christ and Regnum Christi, as well as members’ families and friends, who believe they have been adversely affected by the movement.

Even without a canonical trial, the events of the past several months have brought Father Maciel, the Legion of Christ and Regnum Christi into the public eye and increased the number of inquiries ReGAIN has received.

The move came in a Vatican announcement May 19 in which Pope Benedict XVI called Father Maciel to “a life of prayer and penance.”

The Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith began looking into the matter in 1998 after receiving allegations from nine men – then in their 50s and 60s – who said they had been abused in the 1940s, ’50s and ’60s by the founder.

While many Vatican observers believe that the step indicates there was some credibility to the accusations that Father Maciel had abused teenage boys, many – including some of the accusers – were disappointed that the Vatican did not hold a formal canonical trial. Such a trial could have led to Father Maciel’s laicization.

Innocent or guilty?

A religious priest who is a longtime observer of religious congregations said the effect of the instruction on the Legionaries can’t be pinpointed yet. How it all plays out depends on whether Father Maciel is innocent of the crimes of which he has been accused, said the priest, who asked not to be identified.

“If he is guilty, it’s obviously going to affect them,” the priest said. “If he is guilty, then they can do damage control, if they are completely honest and open and transparent about it, and if they look at what elements of the path they follow have been influenced by this.”

On the other hand, the priest said, if Father Maciel is not guilty, then “the Holy Spirit will be with him and with his institute.”

Regardless, the priest said, the Legionaries and Regnum Christi should both survive and be able to carry on their work.

“Father Maciel has obviously done great things, even if he has fallen into this sin,” he said.

Legion history

The Legionaries and Regnum Christi have sparked controversy for years, being banned from operating in some U.S. dioceses while enjoying wide popularity among some conservative Catholics who admire the group’s fidelity to the magisterium and its success at attracting young men to the priesthood. While there is no formal women’s congregation, some women who belong to Regnum Christi make private promises to consecrate themselves to Christ.

Father Maciel himself has been a lightning rod almost since founding the order in 1941, when he was a 20-year-old seminarian who had left two seminaries in Mexico already.

Father Maciel has been accused of sexual abuse in the past; as now, he proclaimed his innocence.

Kineke, who was a member of Regnum Christi for seven years before leaving in 2000, said the policy of not allowing public criticism makes it very difficult for Legionaries and consecrated members of Regnum Christi to share any negative experiences or information.

Many of them are likely to believe Father Maciel is a persecuted saint, she said. Others, especially Regnum Christi who have outside sources of information, seem to be questioning the congregation’s statements.

But because of Father Maciel’s central role in the formation of Legionaries and Regnum Christi members, Kineke said, it would be difficult for the movement to distance itself from him.

Father Donald Cozzens, author of The Changing Face of the Priesthood, agreed that the instruction to Father Maciel will cause difficulty for the Legionaries and Regnum Christi.

“The church’s action is anything but positive, especially since the allegations against him are coming from mature men,” he said.

But the Legionaries and Regnum Christi likely will not abandon their defense of Father Maciel, Father Cozzens added.

“They are going to stand by their man,” he told Our Sunday Visitor. “I think many of the groups that take a very strict approach to all church teaching are very often motivated by fear that we are losing something in the church. They are going to see this as a threat.”

– – –

Michelle Martin writes from Illinois for Our Sunday Visitor.
– – –

Republished with permission by Catholic Online from the Nov. 2, 2007, issue of Our Sunday Visitor newspaper (www.osv.com) in Huntington, Ind., a Catholic Online Preferred Publishing Partner.

Translate »
%%footer%%